Talk:SNK Playmore
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Mid | This article is on a subject of Mid priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. | |
 |
This article was previously selected for Gaming Collaboration of the week. | |
|
VG To-do:
|
||
 |
SNK Playmore has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
[edit] Kawasaki
The article reads that Playmore was founded by a company called Kawasaki. Which Kawasaki does it refer to? -James A. Calwell III 17:50, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
That would be Eikichi Kawasaki, founder of the original SNK in 1978... a person, not a company. - Stuart Copland 12:01, 25 February 2006 (EST)
[edit] Neo Geo Pocket Color
It was released in Europe, at least in Spain. I remember having in my hands an NGPC bought in Spain; in the package you could read the address of the European SNK headquarters. So the information about it being released ONLY in Japan and Hong Kong is inaccurate. I don't have an account here so it'd be better if a registered user changed it. ~ Segata128 23:51, 10 March 2006 (GMT)
Thats me ^ again. Here and here it says that it was marketed in the US (Wal-Mart, Toys'R'us) and Europe, so I will add the information to the main article.
[edit] SNKPlaymoreUSA vs. SCEA
Is it alright to discuss about SNKUSA, that how most of the games never released for the PS2 and ending up going to Microsoft X-Box? Some might want to know why most of the games never got a released in the US. 65.115.123.226 21:25, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
It was a shame SNKPlaymore made only games now for Game Boy Advance(which my mom and dad got me )and Xbox . —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.247.21.109 (talk • contribs)
- Hard to say, IMO, it just sound bias, it not the company's fault this happen, but I let the other people think if is good for the article.Nauto 22:19, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Links to SNK are for the game company, it is highly unlikely that average EN users would type in SNK and expect to end up at Government of the Soviet Union. The company is now called SNK Playmore, but is most often referred to as SNK, and SNK was the name of the company when it was most notable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnnyMrNinja (talk • contribs)
- It would be very important to have the appropriate hatnote pointing to the moved disambiguation page. No vote at this stage. Andrewa 05:34, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
- Oppose. If you read the article, there were two companies that should have articles with SNK as part of the name, SNK (company) and SNK Playmore. The former was in existence after the latter was created both existed at one time so there should be two articles. Aruze, Brezzasoft and several other companies were the successor companies to SNK, but apparently not Playmore. Again these successor companies were bought out by Playmore which became SNK Playmore. So SNK did not become SNK Playmore. This history makes for a very complicated trail that may not be best dealt with in a single article. Add in the fact that there are several political parties that use the SNK acronym and you have a case where leaving a dab page at SNK may well be the best option. While gamers may consider this to be the same company, it is not. Good articles and a good dab page give you the summary to see what happened over time. Vegaswikian 19:54, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- You are correct that the article contains different companies. There was a separate article at SNK that was merged with the Playmore article. The SNK Playmore article contains the history of SNK as a brand. Playmore and SNK Playmore were created to support the SNK brand. "SNK saw little success on the video game market due to (reportedly deliberate) under-financing on Aruze's part, so the original founder, Eikichi Kawasaki left the company, along with other executives, to found the company named Playmore on August 1, 2001.... In an attempt to regain control of SNK, Kawasaki's new company, Playmore, successfully bid for and were awarded SNK's intellectual rights in late 2001. The company then began to bolster its assets and rehire many of the former SNK employees." The article is about the SNK brand more than it is about the companies. Due to the integration of the two companies, the reasons for the second company's creation, the fact that the two company's histories only overlapped for part of a year, and the fact that the two companies have many of the same properties, people, and company name, it is logical to both histories in one article. Square Co. and Enix have seperate pages because they each have unique histories. There are over 60 links to the SNK disambiguation page, and they are all for the video game company. There are almost 450 links to the SNK Playmore article. From Wikipedia:Naming conventions - "Generally, article naming should prefer what the majority of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature. This is justified by the following principle: Names of Wikipedia articles should be optimized for readers over editors; and for a general audience over specialists." It is a simple question: when people type "SNK" where are they expecting to end up? SNK European Democrats (around 40 links) or SNK Union of Independents (around 30 links), the political parties in Czech Republic? The defunct airline Southeast Airlines (17 links) that doesn't even mention SNK in it's text? Or perhaps the Government of the Soviet Union? This page is for average English readers, it should go where they expect. JohnnyMrNinja 21:08, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- Actually you raise a good point. It almost seems like there should be an article on the brand with an article{s} on the companies. As you point out the references are really to the brand of games. The companies are just a side issue with the brand being the focus. Maybe SNK for the brand and games with SNK Playmore and SNK (company) for the companies. I think with SNK being about the brand, it is clearly the primary use. Vegaswikian 23:11, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Well at the least, as long as we seem to agree that SNK should go to SNK Playmore then that should be fine. I've redirected SNK to SNK Playmore and made a separate dab page. ~ JohnnyMrNinja {talk} 06:48, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- You are correct that the article contains different companies. There was a separate article at SNK that was merged with the Playmore article. The SNK Playmore article contains the history of SNK as a brand. Playmore and SNK Playmore were created to support the SNK brand. "SNK saw little success on the video game market due to (reportedly deliberate) under-financing on Aruze's part, so the original founder, Eikichi Kawasaki left the company, along with other executives, to found the company named Playmore on August 1, 2001.... In an attempt to regain control of SNK, Kawasaki's new company, Playmore, successfully bid for and were awarded SNK's intellectual rights in late 2001. The company then began to bolster its assets and rehire many of the former SNK employees." The article is about the SNK brand more than it is about the companies. Due to the integration of the two companies, the reasons for the second company's creation, the fact that the two company's histories only overlapped for part of a year, and the fact that the two companies have many of the same properties, people, and company name, it is logical to both histories in one article. Square Co. and Enix have seperate pages because they each have unique histories. There are over 60 links to the SNK disambiguation page, and they are all for the video game company. There are almost 450 links to the SNK Playmore article. From Wikipedia:Naming conventions - "Generally, article naming should prefer what the majority of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature. This is justified by the following principle: Names of Wikipedia articles should be optimized for readers over editors; and for a general audience over specialists." It is a simple question: when people type "SNK" where are they expecting to end up? SNK European Democrats (around 40 links) or SNK Union of Independents (around 30 links), the political parties in Czech Republic? The defunct airline Southeast Airlines (17 links) that doesn't even mention SNK in it's text? Or perhaps the Government of the Soviet Union? This page is for average English readers, it should go where they expect. JohnnyMrNinja 21:08, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose They are now SNK Playmore, they haven't used "SNK" in several years. Chuck Quizmo 01:56, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved. --Stemonitis 07:01, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Mvs scandinavia-flyer.jpg
Image:Mvs scandinavia-flyer.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Ssrpg.png
Image:Ssrpg.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:33, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Metal slug marco fight.jpg
Image:Metal slug marco fight.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 00:48, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Crystalis gameplay.png
The image Image:Crystalis gameplay.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
-
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:41, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
