User talk:Smith Jones/Archive 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Contribs

Note that contribs lists are in reverse date order by default, so the last edit on the page is the earliest, and the top edit is the most recent. —Whig (talk) 22:51, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

This is inappropriate. Please refrain from such behavior or you may find an AN/I thread of your own. Perhaps consider joining our Adopt-a-User program. Lara❤Love 15:02, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

In looking over your talk page history, I'm issuing you a final warning regarding your disruptive editing. You will be blocked if you continue with it. Lara❤Love 15:06, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
the wrong with what you said.  Do not try to paint this as me insulting you in some way or attacking you.  If you apologize, perhaps == WP:AN/I ==

[edit] Reverting Duplications

I think we were working to the same result; however, today you reverted my deletion of the first of two duplicate questions left on the Ref Desk by User:EastCoastland02. Was there some technical reason for this, as you just went on to delete both of the duplicates, including the one you had just reverte that I had done? I'd be interested in the rationale. Bielle (talk) 23:32, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your response on my page. There is no problem with the result at all; both duplicates have been deleted. That is all that matters. I was merely curious as to why you had to undo the deletion I had already made to one duplicate. Why didn't you just revert the second duplicate? (We were caught un in an "edit conflict" on the second revert, which is likely the only reason I even noticed what you had done.) I reiterate: I am just curious. Bielle (talk) 23:47, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the explanation. That's all I wanted to know. Bielle (talk) 23:51, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Politician

"Politician" isn't a job. You could have no job and still be a politician. [1] --SMP0328. (talk) 02:52, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

President would count as a job. --SMP0328. (talk) 03:15, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

I thought I was doing you a favor. Now I'm going to delete "of the United States" (just kidding). --SMP0328. (talk) 03:23, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hi

How do I leave you a comment? I was wondering about your comment on my page. Thanks! -- Message from 75.100.84.9 originally; I had to correct the way he/she put it in. -- —Signed by KoЯnfan71 My Talk Sign Here! 03:44, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] MiszaBot

I noticed it did an automatic archive, and perhaps it won't archive when there are only a small number of comments on the page. As long as you let it do its thing I hope it should work from here out. —Whig (talk) 02:21, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Spelling/spacing

Could you please expend the effort you expend on article pages to correctly spell and space your comments on project space? Your work on article pages is exemplary, but often your comments on project space pages are almost unintelligible. Thank you. Horologium (talk) 00:59, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Darko Trifunović

Following the report on AN/I a few days ago of edit warring and BLP problems on Darko Trifunović, on which you commented, I've rewritten the article from scratch. Your views on the rewrite would be appreciated. -- ChrisO (talk) 02:20, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] NPOV policy

You wrote that we should look for "VERIFIABLE NEUTRAL and NOTABLE" sources. I do not understand you. Perhaps you would like to explain what is a neutral source. If you would like to read about our WP:NPOV policy and find a better way to phrase yourself, that might be helpful in communicating. —Whig (talk) 04:36, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Teroristic threat

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Teroristic threat, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Teroristic threat. Truthanado (talk) 01:57, 10 March 2008 (UTC)