User talk:Smimram

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello Smimram, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 

Thank you for your careful, well-summarized contributions. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 16:18, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Tannakian categories

Hello. I started the page tannakian category, because I used to know about the applications. I suspect you would know much more about the actual monoidal category theory involved. Charles Matthews 16:41, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Unfortunately I know almost nothing about tannakian categories. The page you made seems to be a good start though! Samuel Mimram 20:44, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] *-autonomous categories

Hello. I was looking at the page on *-autonomous categories. As far as I can tell, neither the 'alternative definition' nor the 'property' appear in either of the cited articles. I noticed that you added these two points to the article. I have not taken the time to verify them, and I suppose that they may be wrong. Are you sure that existence of an equivalence implies existence of a dualising object? Thanks! --Sam Staton 15:03, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi, I found the properties I've written in the article in various papers. I'll try to find some time to check if they were precisely talking of the same definition of *-autonomous categories. Samuel Mimram 17:56, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi Samuel. Have you had time to find any references yet? Thanks! --Sam Staton 18:16, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hi

You might also enjoy visiting the talk pages of Wikipedia: WikiProject Mathematics, where a lot of general discussion of mathematics topics takes place. linas 13:57, 1 April 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mercury logo.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Mercury logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:43, 8 March 2008 (UTC)