User talk:Skater710

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page has been temporarily protected from editing to prevent this blocked user from causing disruption.

 This page is currently protected from editing to prevent Skater710 (talk • contribs • block logauto) from using it to make disruptive edits or continuing to abuse the {{unblock}} template.
If you have come here to issue a new message to this user, it means the block has expired. Please unprotect the page, ask an administrator to do so, or request unprotection here.

Regarding Barneca

Regarding your complaint, you should note that User:Barneca did not review Edit4bumz's block. Barnecaration is merely an impostor of User:Barneca and has no Wikipedia:Administrator rights. He has now been blocked for misrepresenting himself. Edit4bumz will have his appeal re-evaluated. --  Netsnipe  ►  11:05, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Markbass

1-Please don't remove a "refimprove" tag without actually providing reliable sources. To do so constitutes vandalism. See WP:V. 2-Please remember to be civil. Don't put personal attacks in edit summaries, or anywhere else. Corvus cornix 00:59, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Please read WP:3RR. You're over the limit. Stop now, and you won't be blocked, but you've been warned. In addition, you will be reported for vandalism. As it now stands, you have not provided any evidence that the subject of the article is notable, and WP:CORP could indicate that the article be speedy deleted. User:Stephen gave you the benefit of the doubt by only putting a refimprove tag on the article, and didn't nominate it for speedy deletion, but if you continue to edit war, I will put a speedy deletion nomination on it. Corvus cornix 01:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

There are no big shot editors, just people who have been here longer than other people. But all editors have to abide by Wikipedia policies, and refusing to provide reliable sources when they're requested is vandalism. Corvus cornix 01:04, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

You remove the db- tag and I'll report you for vandalism. Corvus cornix 01:07, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS. Corvus cornix 01:10, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

What part of The nature of Wikipedia means that you cannot make a convincing argument based on what other articles do or do not exist doesn't make sense to you? Corvus cornix 01:13, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

I have nothing further to add to this "discussion". Corvus cornix 01:15, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

November 2007

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruption, sockpuppetry, personal attacks, and harassment. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. east.718 at 01:19, 11/5/2007 01:19, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Can you please show where I have disruption, sockpuppetry, personal attacks, and harassment. I have been trying to help make the Markbass page a relevant part of Wikipedia but I've had many users AND administrators attack me and just disregard any of my input. I have fairly contributed to Wikipedia but have been shut down for no reason. Please review my unfair ban, I'm happy to disscuss and add more information if needed."

Decline reason: "I would be happy to do as you ask. Here is the example you requested of a disruptive edit. The blocking admin was very generous; I would have blocked you for a year, not a week. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Because you posted a personal attack on this page, I have protected it so that you can no longer edit it. Remember, Wikipedia editors do not make personal attacks. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:18, 5 November 2007 (UTC)