User talk:SirLogic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello SirLogic! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, ask me on my talk page, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. And remember, no question is "stupid"; if you have anything, absolutely anything that you'd like to know, feel free to drop on by and leave me a message! :D Happy Editing!
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

GeorgeMoney ☺ (talk) ☺ (Help Desk) ☺ (Reference Desk) ☺ (Help Channel) 19:14, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome

Hi SirLogic, and welcome to Wikipedia!

I notice that you have contributed articles related to Seventh-day Adventism, and would like to invite you to become involved in the Wikipedia:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church which aims specifically to improve Seventh-day Adventist related pages. We are a friendly community with a number of active contributors. -Colin MacLaurin 12:58, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of BibleDatabase

A tag has been placed on BibleDatabase requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DJBullfish 00:56, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bible software

You have added many articles on biblical software, not all of which appear to be notable. If you do not fix them ASAP, they may be deleted as spam, and you may be blocked' as a spammer. Bearian'sBooties (talk) 00:58, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

The majority of them were creating the pages referenced by other pages that had not been stubbed out yet. They are stubs and are intended to be fleshed out at a later time, perhaps by others who are more knowledgeable in the particular subject matter. SirLogic (talk) 01:22, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

You are correct, a speedy was out of the question. Work on them for a few days, and fix the concerns. Bearian'sBooties (talk) 01:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of BibleTime

I have nominated BibleTime, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BibleTime (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 06:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bible Explorer

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Bible Explorer, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Bible Explorer. TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 06:42, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] BibleDatabase

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article BibleDatabase, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 15:05, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of BibleDatabase

I have nominated BibleDatabase, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BibleTime (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 16:35, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bible software

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Bible software, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Bible software. TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 19:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of SwordSearcher

I have nominated SwordSearcher, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SwordSearcher. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 21:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC)