Talk:Single-molecule magnet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Physics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics.

Help with this template This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

Speedy merge proposal regarding Molecule based magnets: Wiki already has Single-molecule magnet V8rik 17:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Molecule based magnets are not single molecule magnets; they're still extended networks of molecules. The two are not equivalent and should not be merged (or, if merged, SMM should be a subcategory of molecule-based magnets, not the other way around). Thatjenn (talk) 23:42, 5 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Copyedit tag

  • Please elaborate on the need for this tag, article is in good shape. What needs to be changed and who will do the work (remember for every 20 people adding tags there is just one doing actual editing) V8rik (talk) 19:49, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
It could use both section breaks and a general clean-up that made an attempt at a non-specialist presentation before dipping into jargon. Phil Sandifer (talk) 19:51, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
I can see that there is content, but its all in the introduction. We can start out with an introduction, the next section can be the background or explanation part. Then we can have that part on history where David Hendrickson comes in. Then the maths comes in \ U = S^2|D|\,. Then the measurements part. Then an application section where the building blocks for a quantum computer comes in and maybe the part about the record magnetization? And perhaps we can have some pictures of such materials in real-world applications or diagrams to visualize how a high spin ground state, high zero-field-splitting and have negligible magnetic interaction between molecules, magnet looks like.
And that maths formula will need an in-text citation to verify its source Venny85 20:25, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
wow, the article looks alot neater and has pictures to support its explanations and applications. The copyedit tag has already been removed. I feel this article now meets a better assessment. Thx guys! Venny85 12:46, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
I love doing research. But we still need a topic expert and a quality word-smith to look at it. WAS 4.250 (talk) 14:34, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
ok, Topic expert tag placed! Venny85 16:01, 7 April 2008 (UTC)