Talk:Simon Reisman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. | ||||||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. | ||||||
|
|||||||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada and related WikiProjects, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canada-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project member page, to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
[edit] Moved from references section
- Canadians Urged to Accept Pact The New York Times
- U.S.-CANADA RIFTS GROW OVER TRADE The New York Times
- Canada's Biggest Paper Crusading To Defeat Trade Treaty With U.S. The New York Times
- Canadians Confer on Trade Rift The New York Times
They don't really say anything about the current content of the Reisman article, so they should either be used as refs for the Free Trade Agreement article, or used when or if the Reisman article is significantly expanded. Anchoress · Weigh Anchor · Catacomb 02:40, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- Just trying to help. —BradV 02:40, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- I'm sure they'll be very helpful once the article is expanded. It's just a bit disingenuous to have refs for content that isn't in the article yet. Hope you didn't take offence, I didn't mean to slight your efforts. Anchoress · Weigh Anchor · Catacomb 03:21, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- Don't worry, I wasn't offended. I've just found, generally, that throwing a couple of references at the bottom of an article - especially one that's nominated for deletion or tagged as non-notable - gives people a head start on the article. —BradV 03:30, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- You could always throw them into an "External links" section until they are used as references. Cheers, CP 03:39, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- That's a good idea, but they're all from the same site. I wonder if NYT has a search feature that would allow us to link to a search result on the site? Anchoress · Weigh Anchor · Catacomb 04:53, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- Good thinking, Bradv15!! BTW, I just checked the Canada-US FTA, and it doesn't have ANY refs!! So the ones you found could well be useful there. Anchoress · Weigh Anchor · Catacomb 04:53, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- You could always throw them into an "External links" section until they are used as references. Cheers, CP 03:39, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- Don't worry, I wasn't offended. I've just found, generally, that throwing a couple of references at the bottom of an article - especially one that's nominated for deletion or tagged as non-notable - gives people a head start on the article. —BradV 03:30, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- I'm sure they'll be very helpful once the article is expanded. It's just a bit disingenuous to have refs for content that isn't in the article yet. Hope you didn't take offence, I didn't mean to slight your efforts. Anchoress · Weigh Anchor · Catacomb 03:21, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
