Talk:Shami Chakrabarti

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.

Contents 1 Annoying? 2 She came on top of the most annoying person in britain 3 Investigation claim 4 Neutral POV 5 Guardian article 6 HIGNFY

[edit] Annoying?

Doesn't anybody else find Shami Chackrabarti the most annoying woman in Britain? She represents what is quite a good cause but is just so annoying when arguing on TV/Radio. She is probably the most annoying person in British politics as a whole, closely followed by Sarah Teather - Lib Dem shadow deputy leader. --213.122.139.163 13:07, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Teather isn't deputy leader. Think maybe she shadows the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister? No comment to make on Shami's annoyingness or otherwise :-) --Whouk (talk) 13:37, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Does this have any relevance? No. Does it pertain to the article? No. Is it right? Well, she is quite persistent; maybe she could be described as 'vocal' in the article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wikinterpreter (talk • contribs) 23:06, 5 December 2006 (UTC).

[edit] She came on top of the most annoying person in britain

why that was not mentioned? --80.42.62.193 15:50, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Because no-one has added the information yet. This article is a stub, not a complete article yet. If you have a source for this, please add the information to the article yourself, citing the reference. Thanks. --Whouk (talk) 16:41, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Investigation claim

I have done a search on the web for the claim that she was investigated and found nothing. Unless someone objects, I plan to remove the claim. Eiler7 19:57, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

If no credible references can be found for this, the claim should be removed. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 20:21, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

I can't find anything on LexisNexis. —Whouk (talk) 20:29, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

In light of the official policy, I am removing the claim. See WP:V for more details. Eiler7 15:47, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Neutral POV

I do not believe this article is written from a neutral POV, and is biased favourably towards Chakrabarti. --163.1.38.194 09:37, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

I disagree strongly. This article is neutral.--84.9.46.37 16:16, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

I agree that the article seems to be biased, and I think its the lyrics of the song that give that impression - perhaps they should be replaced with a link to the appropriate page on a lyrics site? Davfleming 18:58, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

I have removed the lyrics and replaced them with a link, I would argue this makes the article conform to neutral POV. Davfleming 19:28, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Guardian article

I can find no article in March in the Guardian in which Shami Chakrabarti refuses to condemn the terrorist attacks. Can others please check. Nicolharper 14:21, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] HIGNFY

Anybody else see her on Have I Got News For You last night? I usually quite respect her, but she was useless on the show! -Tpacw (talk) 10:14, 24 May 2008 (UTC)