User talk:RyanParis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, RyanParis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  El_C

Contents

[edit] May 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Ghost. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 14:49, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

Please do not remove material from articles without explanation as you did with White people. There is a risk that your changes might be interpreted as vandalism. EdJohnston 21:16, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Creationism, you will be blocked from editing. Third warning. WLU 21:18, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tabercil 04:50, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Excessive Wikifying

Please stop wikifying every little item in lead sections of articles, such as science, pseudoscience, etc. etc., (see you own edit history). There is a purpose to the links, which is to allow links to a reasoned selection of topics pertinent to the topic of a particular article. Please see WP:MOS#Wikilinks, for guidance on how to approach these. In the interim, I will be reverting those that come to my attention. Thanks. ... Kenosis 04:01, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edits to Spirituality

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. El_C 11:41, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Science

I do not believe that the deletions you have made to this article reflect consensus or indeed accurately reflect the nature of science. You should explain your edit on the talk page and try to convince people. --Bduke (talk) 05:00, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

I am not going to continue to revert your edits. I leave it others who spend more time on this article than I do to see if they find them acceptable. However, would you please use edit summaries so we all have some idea of your thinking behind a particular edit. Edits to the lead are usually best discussed first on the talk page. --Bduke (talk) 06:27, 22 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Jan 2008

You have removed the following edit from the definition of Science:

A not entirely compatible definition is that Science is the attempt to create procedures to predict the outcome of experimental situations. Such definitions become increasingly relevant at the microscopic scales of Quantum Mechanics. Ironically the latter is often considered to be the foundation of all (at least Natural) Sciences.

Please explain why.

Any description of Science is not complete without a Positivist understandins. At the moment the article is biased towards realist models of the world. This is particularly inappropriate for Quantum Mechanics.

Keith Bowden (Theoretical Physics Research Unit, Birkbeck College, London) ¬¬¬¬ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Keithbowden (talk • contribs) 13:39, 11 January 2008 (UTC)