Talk:RTÉ News: One O'Clock
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Ireland on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page. | |
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance on the priority scale. | |
There is a new set nowSeamus215 17:18, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Radio / TV
For clarity I propose splitting this article into two: one dealing with the radio and one with the television news broadcast.
The news programmes at 13.00 on RTÉ Radio 1 and RTÉ One (television) have, in any case, different names – respectively, News at One and One News – neither of which is (the currently shown here) "RTÉ News: One O'Clock"..! -- Picapica 23:19, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- Er, RTE News: One O'Clock IS the name of the television programme. If you don't believe me, look at the logo (it features the words "RTÉ NEWS" with "ONE O'CLOCK" underneath, how clearer can you get!) and watch an edition on TV, or on the website if you can't get to a TV at 13:00. Prior to September 2003 it was "The One O'Clock News". Despite use on RTE Online, One News has never been the name of the programme (nor, for that matter, has the Nine O'Clock programme ever been called Nine News).
- But yes, the inital suggestion that they be seperated is a good idea. We would need enough content for both though... --Rdd 12:21, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
OK, it's a fair cop about the name of the TV programme! (I have been over-influenced by [1] [2] [3] (I can only "read" these bulletins at present, being out of the country and normally without access to streaming video.)
RTÉ News at One is the name of two RTÉ News programmes, one a television news bulletin... is still an incorrect statement, however, and I will change it when I split the article. In my view we already do have the content for two articles. No WP article has necessarily to spring into life fully formed: isn't that most of the force of a collaborative project? -- Picapica 12:19, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- Really should be two articles, all right.FlowerpotmaN·(t) 23:02, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
