Talk:Romanization of Chinese

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Romanization of Chinese was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is part of WikiProject China, a project to improve all China-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other China-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. (add comments)
More information about this article...
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Languages, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, and easy-to-use resource about languages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
language Portal
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.

Contents

[edit] GA passed

This article passes all requirements of the criteria at WP:WIAGA I am passing it. Congrats! Also consider nominating it for Featured status. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 03:58, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA delisted

Based on changes that have been made to this article since its G.A. review, I am unfortunately going to have to delist it. The following concern has arisen and needs to be addressed:

  • The section titled "Yale system" has substancially changed and the additions have been tagged as unreferenced with {fact} tags. See dif between reviewed and current versions: [1] This seems to indicate to me that the article now fails the referencing and stability requirements as spelled out in WP:WIAGA.

There are a few options on how to deal with this:

  • If you think this article, in its current state, should not have been delisted, please go to Good Article/Review and request that others look at the article in the state it is in, and vote on the decision to delist.
  • If you think the article can be improved back to GA status, do so and then renominate it at Good Article Candidates for someone to review it again.

If you have any questions or concerns about this, please see me at my talk page. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 01:23, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gwoyeu Romatzyh (information)

For your information, the Chinese romanization system Gwoyeu Romatzyh has been a FAC since 26 March. --NigelG (or Ndsg) | Talk 12:56, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Any comments on the color-coding issue being discussed on the FAC page would be welcome. --NigelG (or Ndsg) | Talk 09:23, 2 April 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Comparison?

I think it would be nice to have a table in the article, with selected chinese words and phrases romanized by each of the discussed systems (at least, where it's possible; it might not be with the postal system)

I would do this myself, but don't know enough about chinese, or any of these systems, to do so. 68.13.167.236 01:57, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm going to try it anyway, using this as my notepad. it's not complete.

Comparison of the various systems

Hànyŭ pīnyīn: Rénrén shēng ér zìyóu, zài zūnyán hé quánlì shàng yīlǜ píngdĕng. Tāmen fùyŏu lĭxìng hé liángxīn, bìng yīng yĭ xiōngdì guānxì de jīngshén hùxiāng duìdài. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.13.167.236 (talk) 06:09, August 28, 2007 (UTC)