Talk:Richard Wetz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Richard Wetz was a good article nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Reviewed version: September 12, 2007

Richard Wetz is related to the Composers WikiProject which has been provided as a place for editors of biographical articles of music Composers and Songwriters to discuss common issues, discover neglected composer articles and exchange ideas. All who are interested are invited to comment and contribute.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia.
Did You Know An entry from Richard Wetz appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on December 25, 2006.
Wikipedia

[edit] Notes

Noting down here; it may not be worth inclusion in article. His death was memorialized in Erfurt with a concert containing his quartet in F minor and some lieder (page 246, Jg. 103 Neue Zeitschrift für Musik.) Then - Page 360 of the same issue notes a performance of the symphony no. 2 in Mannheim - p. 461, the second quartet, page 595 symphony number 3 of the same volume of this volume of the Zeitschrift. (Not sure if I looked further that day; this was during some research at the library, and I need to return to same.) Not surprisingly, some performance history after demise even for composers who are not household names. The 103 Jg. is a yearly expanse (not January-December, I think, I'll have to check, but still a years' worth of issues) with Jg. 87 having been released in 1920 and Jg 110 released in 1943. Again, probably partial list so far here. Schissel | Sound the Note! 16:33, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Any chance you have citations for those? We'd love to add sourced material. ~Kylu (u|t) 08:54, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA Review

This is a well-written article, it just needs more citations in the Biography, Style, and Reception sections (although Style is of least importance) before it can be passed. The symphonies he is best known for should also be named in the lead. So, for now this will be on hold. --~ Joe Jklin (T C) 02:38, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Here's a list that might help with improvements --~ Joe Jklin (T C) 02:49, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
  5. It is stable.
  6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
  7. Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:
Going to try to find an audio clip, somewhere, and perhaps some links to currently available works without looking like I'm spamming. Hm. ~Kylu (u|t) 02:20, 8 September 2007 (UTC)\
GA Failed. Not enough improvement were made in the seven days in order to pass it. This article still needs more reliable citations and could use a good image or two. You can see my comments above for further improvements~ Joe Jklin (T C) 03:21, 12 September 2007 (UTC)