Talk:Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

My serious concern with the RDF is the point that the RDF will fund psychology research. It should be about education only. I believe that Dawkins is ignorant about the research that has already been done and did not profoundly search the NIH databases or track down the papers in that regard.Slicky 14:33, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Mate, Dawkins is anything but ignorant. He is one of the few enlightened people that see religion for what it is. --203.30.68.49 (talk) 01:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dumping some 3rd party sources

Hi, just dumping them here, I'm in a hurry, and can't complete it now:

• http://observer.guardian.co.uk/columnists/story/0,,1810833,00.html
• http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/2506/ hmm, Spiked (magazine).

Have to go, Merzul (talk) 10:36, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, those were not so useful.

Find sources: Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science — news, books, scholar. Merzul (talk) 13:27, 27 April 2008 (UTC)