Talk:Rheology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. [FAQ] |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics. |
|
Help with this template Please rate this article, and then leave comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify its strengths and weaknesses. |
|
The relation between rheolohy and fluid dynamics?
- Rheology is a subset of Fluid Dynamics. Still 22:43, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Error?
The article says: <...> rheology is principally concerned with extending the "classical" disciplines of ELASTICITY and Newtonian fluid mechanics <...>
but in the diagram we see that it is related with PLASTICITY and Newtoniam fuild mechanics. Which is the correct? nopes read it again —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.164.33.194 (talk) 07:08, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
The article also claims that engineering is not considered part of rheology. This is inaccurate. The current president of the Society of Rheology is a chemical engineer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.112.34.254 (talk) 13:26, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Rheological Additives
This site has a great, easy to read explanation of rheology: http://www.specialchem4coatings.com/tc/rheology-modifiers/index.aspx?id=basics
