Talk:Reviews on the Run
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Television, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to television programs and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Low | This article is on a subject of Low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. | |
|
VG To-do:
|
||
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 11 February 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 |
A Television infobox needs to be added to this article, or the current one needs to be updated. For formatting information see the instructions. |
[edit] Name Change
I vote we change the name to "Reviews on the Run", since the show no longer uses the "Judgment Day" name. -- VederJuda 20:57, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
- I say just go ahead and do it. It seems that it's only known as Judgment Day in the U.S. and as Reviews on the Run everywhere else. Even though I'm from the U.S. and originally knew of the show as Judgment Day I agree that the article should have the more widely used name. --TheKoG (talk|contribs) 15:57, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Done. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 18:02, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
-
Even though I like the name Judgement Day more, I agree with this change. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.146.99.140 (talk • contribs)
- Oh God, I hope this doesn't come back to the US. Shouldn't this article have a section about criticisms? Like how they don't review games on the show, they just give their personal opinions? The show sucks in general, but that's just my opinion. But the fact that they admittedly don't give fair reviews ought to be mentioned somewhere. 68.181.224.25 20:36, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
-
- Only if you can source it. Perhaps you should review the show rather than just give your personal opinion. ;) 75.16.230.111 (talk) 22:33, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:JD whole.png
Image:JD whole.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Abdi-malli Omar?
Sorry, maybe I missed the episode, but it sounds like someone edited that one in as a prank.. - NemFX (talk) 03:47, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
