Talk:Reverse marketing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I cannot fathom where this is blatant advertising for anything. sriks8 (talk) 16:37, 20 December 2007 (UTC) Neither can I, as the reviewing admin. It's not really an ad, but it does not show that anyone has ever used the term in an independent published reliable source--if they have, add the refs. Changed to prod., to give your 4 or 5 days to find them. If you remove the tag without improving the article, it should go to AfD, where it will probably not pass. DGG (talk) 17:43, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

I adjusted the references. The two "articles" you had at first were not usable sources--they are really just PR releases. the one you just found is good--and so was another from the external references. It would be good to get a more recent reference also.

But I also removed the example, which might have looked like excessive mention of a particular company. I doubt it was intended, but if you're going to give example like that , you should give a range of them--and they are usually not necessary--it's better to talk a little more abstractly, and perhaps mention within a single sentence a few cases, with refs. I think the article might hold up now, so I removed the tag. But be prepared to defend it.DGG (talk) 00:30, 21 December 2007 (UTC)