Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Policies/Userbox content

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Page format

I'm still unsure on whether we should follow the "endorse/oppose this summary" format, or just have threaded discussions. Any suggestions? - Mtmelendez (Talk) 15:08, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Makes it hard to reply with neutral or opposing comments. Adding neutral/oppose subsections to each summary would be impractical. I'd say we could leave the separate summaries, just lose the "I endorse" subsections and allow free discussion below each summary. Equazcion •✗/C • 15:13, 17 Jan 2008 (UTC)
Done. - Mtmelendez (Talk) 16:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
I don't see what's done, but ok :) Equazcion •✗/C • 16:15, 17 Jan 2008 (UTC)
K, now I do :) Equazcion •✗/C • 16:16, 17 Jan 2008 (UTC)
Yep, got momentarily busy with something else in between editing. :) - Mtmelendez (Talk) 16:18, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikiquette alert for User:WebHamster

I've posted a wikiquette alert at WP:WQA#User:WebHamster. I've never done one of these before so I don't know what exactly happens next, but there it is. Equazcion •✗/C • 20:33, 17 Jan 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hm.

What exactly do people think to gain from this discussion? >Radiant< 23:57, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Some sort of fair consensus on how to handle this issue, maybe? This user feels the status quo is flawed. -- Kendrick7talk 00:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Kendrick summed it up. It doesn't hurt to have a centralized good-faithed discussion on hot topics every once in a while, does it? - Mtmelendez (Talk) 01:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Summary?

Can someone summarize the history of the issue? Not the particular MfD that got us here but the history of userbox deletions and POV in userspace.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 03:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Ooops, I guess you're doing this in the Project Space not the talk space, the link posted on MfD's talk took me here. Guess I better do some reading.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 03:17, 18 January 2008 (UTC)