Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Ali'i
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Edit count for Ali'i
User:Ali'i
run at Thu Jun 12 17:20:32 2008 GMT
Image talk: 2
Image: 134
Mainspace 1885
Talk: 463
Template talk: 3
Template: 8
User talk: 438
User: 38
Wikipedia talk: 137
Wikipedia: 488
avg edits per page 2.38
earliest 20:42, 17 August 2006
number of unique pages 1511
total 3596
2006/8 28
2006/9 8
2006/10 4
2006/11 0
2006/12 52
2007/1 12
2007/2 24
2007/3 384
2007/4 581
2007/5 356
2007/6 98
2007/7 42
2007/8 201
2007/9 267
2007/10 313
2007/11 207
2007/12 223
2008/1 65
2008/2 0
2008/3 125
2008/4 238
2008/5 223
2008/6 145
(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red
denotes edits without an edit summary)
Mainspace
77 [2]Republican Party (United States)
58 [3]Wildlife of Brazil
57 [4]Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed
50 [5]Sinbad (actor)
42 [6]Fred Thompson
42 [7]United States Congress
37 [8]Preamble to the United States Constitution
30
[9]List of Major League Baseball players named in the Mitchell Report
29 [10]AACS encryption key controversy
23 [11]Neil Cavuto
21 [12]Kamehameha I
21 [13]USS Arizona Memorial
20 [14]List of United States Representatives from Hawaii
19 [15]List of United States Representatives from California
17 [16]John McCain
Talk:
71 [17]Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed
49 [18]Fred Thompson
47 [19]AACS encryption key controversy
20 [20]John McCain
18
[21]List of Major League Baseball players named in the Mitchell Report
18 [22]Virginia Tech massacre
14 [23]Democratic Party (United States)
13 [24]Republican Party (United States)
13 [25]Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows
13 [26]Seung-Hui Cho
8 [27]Mitchell Report (baseball)
8 [28]Phony soldiers controversy
7 [29]Sinbad (actor)
7 [30]SureFire M6 Guardian
7 [31]Cow tipping
Image:
4 [32]Skille scores badedit.jpg
3 [33]Swanson5818a.jpg
3 [34]Oldfashioned.jpg
3 [35]PDRM Bikes.JPG
3 [36]JohnnyMathis7183-1000.JPG
3 [37]Saturnia pyri Hatching.JPG
2 [38]Homopholis fasciata1.JPG
2 [39]Downtown Buffalo05.JPG
2 [40]Agamy1.jpg
2 [41]Usnchaff.jpg
2 [42]FrankRijkaard2.jpg
2 [43]FTWORTHTX3223.JPG
2 [44]Torresian crow.jpg
2 [45]Betty Lamp lighted.jpg
2 [46]IMG 2331 medium.jpg
Template:
3 [47]Hawaii County, Hawaii
Template talk:
2 [48]Party shading
User:
3 [49]HPJoker
3 [50]Barneca/Requests for Jimboship/Barneca
3 [51]Ali'i
2 [52]UBX/New South Wales Blues
2
[53]Barneca/Miscellany for deletion/User:Barneca/Requests for Jimboship
/Barneca
2 [54]TheParanoidOne
2 [55]Ali'i/1
User talk:
45 [56]Ali'i
15 [57]Orangemarlin
8 [58]Durin
7 [59]FeloniousMonk
7 [60]Ferrylodge
5 [61]HPJoker
4 [62]Grizzlybear82
4 [63]Messedrocker/Unreferenced BLPs
4 [64]SqueakBox/Archivehistory
4 [65]Odd nature/Archive1
4 [66]WJBscribe
4 [67]Mackensen
4 [68]217.43.58.136
4 [69]Jimbo Wales
3 [70]Bjweeks
Wikipedia:
92 [71]Administrators' noticeboard
66 [72]Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
33 [73]Requests for comment/User names
28 [74]Requests for arbitration/Ferrylodge/Workshop
19 [75]Village pump (proposals)
13 [76]Main Page/Errors
12 [77]Requests for arbitration
11 [78]Administrators' noticeboard/Arbitration enforcement
8 [79]Articles for deletion/Allison Stokke (second nomination)
7 [80]Requests for arbitration/Ferrylodge/Evidence
7 [81]Community sanction noticeboard
7 [82]Village pump (policy)
6 [83]Requests for rollback
5 [84]In the news section on the Main Page/Candidates
5 [85]Requests for comment/Intelligent Design
Wikipedia talk:
29 [86]Requests for comment/User names
9 [87]Featured article criteria
8 [88]WikiProject Hawaii/Archive 1
6 [89]Requests for comment/Italiavivi
6 [90]Banning policy
5 [91]Manual of Style (links)/Archive 3
4 [92]Username policy
4 [93]The Core Contest
4 [94]Administrators' noticeboard
4 [95]Requests for arbitration/Ferrylodge/Workshop
4 [96]Requests for arbitration/Ferrylodge/Proposed decision
4 [97]WikiProject U.S. Congress
3 [98]AutoWikiBrowser/Typos
3 [99]Requests for comment/Intelligent Design
3 [100]WikiProject Hawaii/to do
If there were any problems, please [101]email Interiot or post at
[102]User talk:Interiot.
- The edit count was retrieved from this link at 17:20, 12 June 2008 (UTC).
[edit] 2 kinds of requests
Somehow people are all buying into this not being a serious request. It is. Two kinds of requests:
Maybe I wasn't clear enough. Alas. --Ali'i 20:14, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- The issue I see is that you didn't actually give any clear situations in which you envisioned you might use the tools until the answer to question #7. It sounded as if you just wanted them 'just because', and this wasn't clarified until the tone of the RFA had already been set. It's a bit of an own goal, in my opinion, since this ambiguity most probably would have been avoided by answering question #1. - BanyanTree 23:45, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I think you made a few fundamental errors in your nomination. There is a level of flippancy and facetiousness lingering in the air around your RfA. You've also contradicted yourself a few times. Furthermore, you essentially admitted to wanting to prove that RfA either is or is not a big deal. This coupled to flat out saying you will not use the tools (sorry, you can backpedal all you want, but that's what you said) is causing people to view this RfA as a farce. Wisdom89 (T / C) 23:49, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Let's try to be a little more precise in our use of language. Some people may view this RfA as a farce, indeed they may view life itself as the ultimate farce, but let's not ascribe that opinion to everyone who doesn't agree with us, eh? --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 00:08, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- I didn't say everyone. I said people, which actually implies not everyone. Let's try not to rely on semantics. Wisdom89 (T / C) 00:10, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Have you considered borrowing a dictionary? Semantics is concerned with the meaning of words. Are you suggesting that we should simply ignore what the words mean, and just use whichever ones we feel are fashionable? --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 00:23, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- MF, what consequence is it to you wether Wisdom can use the type of grammar skills you deem "appropriate"? Is this at all in response to his statement, or just poking fun at his choice of words?--Koji†Dude (C) 00:26, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Who mentioned grammar? I thought we were discussing semantics? Would you like to borrow Wisdom's dictionary once he's finished with it? --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 00:30, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- MF, dude, how about you stifle the sarcasm. I am well aware of the meaning of the word semantics, and quite a few others for that matter. My point is that we shouldn't harp on semantics. It should have been patently obvious that my earlier comment did not imply that I felt everyone thought the RfA was a farce, but that some people did. Wisdom89 (T / C) 00:33, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Who mentioned grammar? I thought we were discussing semantics? Would you like to borrow Wisdom's dictionary once he's finished with it? --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 00:30, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- MF, what consequence is it to you wether Wisdom can use the type of grammar skills you deem "appropriate"? Is this at all in response to his statement, or just poking fun at his choice of words?--Koji†Dude (C) 00:26, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Have you considered borrowing a dictionary? Semantics is concerned with the meaning of words. Are you suggesting that we should simply ignore what the words mean, and just use whichever ones we feel are fashionable? --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 00:23, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- I didn't say everyone. I said people, which actually implies not everyone. Let's try not to rely on semantics. Wisdom89 (T / C) 00:10, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Let's try to be a little more precise in our use of language. Some people may view this RfA as a farce, indeed they may view life itself as the ultimate farce, but let's not ascribe that opinion to everyone who doesn't agree with us, eh? --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 00:08, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I think you made a few fundamental errors in your nomination. There is a level of flippancy and facetiousness lingering in the air around your RfA. You've also contradicted yourself a few times. Furthermore, you essentially admitted to wanting to prove that RfA either is or is not a big deal. This coupled to flat out saying you will not use the tools (sorry, you can backpedal all you want, but that's what you said) is causing people to view this RfA as a farce. Wisdom89 (T / C) 23:49, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
