Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Olahus

[edit] Olahus

• Olahus (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Panel 2008 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Marc KJH (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Code letter: G
• Supporting evidence: If you look at the Central Europe and Mitteleuropa articles, you'll notice that there's been a number of editing wars going on in the last week. See the history page of http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Central_Europe&action=history. Olahus has been trying to impose his will on the article by using his sock puppets to revert ANY changes made to the article (especially those removing Romania off the list), and has been edit warring with them. The articles have been at a standstill for the past week, because he won't allow anyone to make any changes with his sockpuppets. Even if someone provides citations/sources, he removes it, giving it no time to be discussed. And his addition of Romania to the main list (which is what this whole thing is really about) has been questioned, and hasn't reached a consensus. He's been participating with all his accounts in discussions to give an impression that there is consensus with adding Romania to the list - See here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Central_Europe/Archive_1#Now_that_Romania_and_Croatia_have_been_added.... Furthermore, it seems like he's been doing this in the past as well - See Marc KJH's first discussion on his talk page - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Marc_KJH . And lastly, when I sockpuppeted their accounts, Mark_KJH immediately removed his off his page, and removed it off of Olahus' page as well (even though I linked Olahus to Panel_2008) - doesn't make sense does it? See here - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Olahus&action=history I hope I did this right, because I think that page has gone to shreds unfortunately. It's unfortunate that people can't play nice when they're editing on here. --Buffer v2 (talk) 18:33, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The request was made by a Sock/Meatpuppeter itself

• • The CheckUser must take into account that this user uses socks: Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Buffer_v2 as he admitted. Marc KJH (talk) 18:35, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Excuse me? Make your own checkuser page. I explained the situation there - I do have friends, my major is a double degree in politics and geography - it makes sense that they might have interest in a topic like this. That was not posted by me and there's no way to prove your allegation. Either way, it really has nothing to do with your actions. This is a page for you, not me. Like I said, you're free to make one for me. --Buffer v2 (talk) 18:40, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Nobody trust your lies. You lie, you had used socks and you'll got banned for that. Now, you admit only your 'friends' helped you...come on be serious, all accounts were single-article oriented to help your own edits. You use socks, and you'll be banned for that. Despite you have double degree..fact that I take is a border lie. Marc KJH (talk) 18:43, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Okay, even if you do get me on the Meatpuppet accusation - fine, it happened once. You did it hundreds of times. FINALLY, I dont think we're supposed to be editing here, I HAVE a talk page, and you HAVE your report page. I'm not replying anymore on here. Take it elsewhere.--Buffer v2 (talk) 18:49, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Buffer/Careuc and so on...you used socks not only meatpuppet but sock-puppetry Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Buffer v2. And it happened not only once. Marc KJH (talk) 18:51, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm not a sockpuppet of any user and I don't use sockpuppets. In order to proove this I a would like to ask an administrator to verify the ip-adress. --Olahus (talk) 22:49, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

You have been accused of it before - there is already a request for checkuser, and your activities ARE very suspicious. Your other two accounts made their first edits, a week ago, when the whole editing faisco began. There is no doubt in my mind that you are using the other two accounts as puppets, and if not, you've managed to [easily] fool the checkuser. However, anyone with a shred of logic, looking at all the evidence compiled, will realize that you are using the two accounts as puppets - and if they don't, at least meatpuppeting can be argued easily. It's funny how wherever you go, your other two accounts seem to be editing right there behind you - e.g. the Turkey article in which an admin accused of using a sock puppet (here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Marc_KJH ), and now the Mitteleuropa and Central Europe articles. So please, just save it. --Buffer v2 (talk) 23:04, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

• Marc KJH, Panel 2008 and Olhaus are apparently Unrelated; they edit from three different countries and do not appear to be using proxies.
• Confirmed that about half the edits of Careuc (talk · contribs) have come from the residential IP address of Buffer v2 (talk · contribs). Thatcher 02:19, 23 March 2008 (UTC)