From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Salut! Am dat revert la editarile din articolul Central Europe. Cred ca cel putin momentan, articolul trebuie sa ramana asa. --Olahus (talk) 15:16, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

ok.--Panel 2008 (talk) 22:11, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Contents 1 Central Europe 2 April 2008 3 Mediation cabal 4 East-Central Europe 5 Vandalism warning: Eastern Europe 6 Vandalism warning: Balkans 7 Central Europe 8 Vandalism Warning: Central Europe 9 Blocked 10 =Bonaparte puppet

[edit] Central Europe

I'm not sure if I understand this correctly, but you're reminding me to stop reverting people's edits? a) I havent made 4 reverts in the last 24 hours b) You're reverting mine c) I have valid sources d) you're being biased e) stop being unreasonable. Thanks--Buffer v2 (talk) 05:47, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

lol.. I didn't get consensus on the talk page... and you did?? I have ACTUAL sources and evidence. I don't need consensus. Explain please. Go ahead, I'm still waiting on that. Good luck, but you'll fail.--Buffer v2 (talk) 06:45, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Central Europe, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. JdeJ (talk) 16:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

lol. Romania is part of CE. Panel 2008 (talk) 05:17, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, but nobody is interested in personal opinions here. There has been a long discussion on the talk page and decided to use the current version of the article. If you disagree, then use the talk page to discuss instead of just vandalising the page. And yes, removing a consensus version that is well sourced to replace it with your own personal opinion is plain vandalism.JdeJ (talk) 07:39, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

What personal opinion? Romania is part of CE and this is it. Panel 2008 (talk) 08:31, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Central Europe, you will be blocked from editing. JdeJ (talk) 07:41, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Central Europe. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. JdeJ (talk) 12:00, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Central Europe, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Don't break the consensus. If you have issues with it, bring new sources. Pundit|utter 17:23, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Central Europe.
Any further vandalism will result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Pundit|utter 17:26, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mediation cabal

There's a case at the Mediation Cabal where you have been named as an involved party: Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-04-22 Central Europe. Your input would be appreciated. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 02:47, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] East-Central Europe

Please could you suggest me what part of the article on East-Central Europe contains original research? Montessquieu (talk) 06:49, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism warning: Eastern Europe

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

⇨ EconomistBR ⇦ Talk 04:24, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism warning: Balkans

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

⇨ EconomistBR ⇦ Talk 04:34, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Central Europe

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Central Europe. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --221.114.141.220 (talk) 03:24, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

You're sock of Buffer v2. It's not nice to reactivate your old habit.

No, but you're a fanatical edit warrior unable to listen to reason. It's not nice to reactivate your old habits, son. --221.114.141.220 (talk) 03:49, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

And why, pray tell, would anyone NEED a sock to oppose you? It's -- what? -- 16-to-1 against? Creating a sock would be over-egging the pudding, I'm afraid. --221.114.141.220 (talk) 03:50, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Really? It's 22 millions+CIA+President of France+..etc vs 16 bias people who use socks, including you Buffer.Panel 2008 (talk) 03:52, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Twenty-two million? And you know this how, exactly? Do you have that many friends on your Facebook page, perhaps? --221.114.141.220 (talk) 03:57, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

So, you're up to 4 reverts. Do you want to go for 5, thus providing convincing proof to the administrators that you have no intention of stopping and are therefore eligible for a nice long preventative block to stop you? Or would you prefer an actual discussion where you're required to provide some convincing evidence for your views? --221.114.141.220 (talk) 03:57, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism Warning: Central Europe

Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

⇨ EconomistBR ⇦ Talk 03:59, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

Blocked: 48 for edit warring. When you're released from this block, please strive to edit in a less hostile manner and try negotiation before devolving into blindly reverting others' edits. I'm particularly unimpressed with your accusations of sockpuppetry and insults directed at others' nationalities. east.718 at 05:40, May 14, 2008

[edit] =Bonaparte puppet

This user is a sock-puppet of the banned user Bonaparte. 128.214.107.53 (talk) 08:34, 20 May 2008 (UTC)