Talk:Republic of China Navy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Tables for ships?
I was wondering if anyone had any objections to organizing the list of ships in the fleet into a table similar to the aircraft in the interest of clarity and saving space? Example below. -Loren 07:03, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
| Class | Origin | Type | In service | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kee Lung class | Destroyer | 4 | Kidd class | |
| Cheng Kung class | Frigate | 8 | Oliver Hazard Perry class produced under licence by CSBC Corporation, Taiwan. | |
| Chi Yang class | Frigate | 8 | Knox class | |
| Kang Ding class | Frigate | 6 | La Fayette class | |
| Hai Lung class | Submarine | 2 | Zwaardvis class | |
| Hai Shih class | Submarine | 2 | Tench class | |
| Hsuhai class | Amphibious | 1 | Anchorage class | |
| Chung Ho class | Amphibious | 2 | Newport class | |
| Chung Hai class | Amphibious | 10 | LST-1 | |
| Mei Lo class | Amphibious | 4 | LSM-1 | |
| Yung Yang class | Minesweeper | 4 | Aggressive class | |
| Yung Feng class | Minesweeper | 4 | MMW50 class | |
| Ching Chiang class | Guided missile patrol | 12 | ||
| Kung Hua VI class | Guided missile patrol | 1 | 30 planned but funds currently frozen due to disputes over tendering process. | |
| Hai Ou class | Guided missile patrol | 48 | Dvora class. | |
| Da Guan class | Survey | 1 |
[edit] Grammar
"Aircraft" not "aircrafts", please. John Smith's (talk) 10:05, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Upper or lower case and general style
In the tables that list the various aircraft, missiles, etc and anon-IP editor has changed upper case descriptions to lower case ones. For example "maritime patrol aircraft" instead of "Maritime patrol aircraft". I personally prefer upper case, so unless anyone has strong objections I will change them over when I have the time. Otherwise please leave your views here.
Furthermore I agree with Loren's proposal above. I don't like the colour of the current table, nor the fact it's separated. I'll look into carrying out the work when possible. John Smith's (talk) 20:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Further to there being no objections, I have changed the table colour to a nice "naval grey" which is more in keeping with the article's theme (the blue-green was not nice). I have also merged destroyers and frigates together into "surface combatants", rather than have a table for one class of ship.
On the matter of aircraft in service, I don't think it would be appropriate using a citation from four years ago. John Smith's (talk) 16:10, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
I've also made a few edits to try to get the pictures to line up properly and remove clashes between the "edit" links and the pictures - apologies for not getting it on the first edit. John Smith's (talk) 16:15, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
One last thing. I changed the patrol ship entry to "Fast Attack Missile Craft", as they all carry anti-ship missiles so there's no point using the more generic "patrol" type. John Smith's (talk) 16:21, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] under construction
I disagree with removing that information. Saying when something will be completed is not the same as saying its currently under construction. So I will revert its omission to restore that piece of information.Giovanni33 (talk) 23:52, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- In that case it's also misleading to say 30 are under construction, as they're not. I am changing the entry accordingly. John Smith's (talk) 00:08, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Edits by 24.85.227.16
This editor has been removing wikilinks from all three ROC military pages with no explanation. I have reverted his latest changes as vandalism - please be on the look-out. If he does it again, please report him. John Smith's (talk) 12:44, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

