Talk:Relational quantum mechanics
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. [FAQ] |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics. |
|
Help with this template Please rate this article, and then leave comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify its strengths and weaknesses. |
|
The three conditions listed under Structure do not display properly. I don't know how to fix them. Anville 22:26, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- Look now. --GangofOne 22:45, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- Much nicer! Where in the documentation does it explain how to do that? (LaTeX I can generally handle pretty darn well, but TeX markup in wiki-world is a different matter.) Anville 01:03, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- I never saw it in the docs, I learned it from someone else when this issue came up before. --GangofOne 01:17, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- I have noticed people putting what seemed to me to be a superfluous backslash at the end of TeX bits, but never really understood what it was for. To be honest, I still don't quite know what it is for, because the equations were showing quite fine on my end...what do they look like without the slash? Byrgenwulf 09:08, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- I never saw it in the docs, I learned it from someone else when this issue came up before. --GangofOne 01:17, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Much nicer! Where in the documentation does it explain how to do that? (LaTeX I can generally handle pretty darn well, but TeX markup in wiki-world is a different matter.) Anville 01:03, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- I took a screenshot of the old version and cropped it to illustrate the problem, as shown at stage right. Anville 18:36, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
Ah, thanks. That does look unseemly. So I should remember, then, to include the superfluous backslashes. Byrgenwulf 00:16, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] "Relational solution"
As it stands, the "Relational solution" to the EPR/Bell problem is described as solving a non-problem. The stated "problem" is equivalent to mailing Alice and Bob letters containing the numbers 1 and -1, and then asking how Alice's envelope can "know" that the other has the opposite value. In other words, as stated, it is easily explained by hidden variables. This section needs to begin with a sketch of the actual problem, rather than a full explanation of a non-problem. The nature of the proposed solution is no different.
