User talk:Rbanzai/Archives/2008/April

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Re: reversion

No problem. I guess most vandals don't realize how "good" the good guys are :P J.delanoygabsadds 22:29, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Sig

Please keep up the good work on new page patrolling but please, always sign talk page nessages with ~~~~. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 19:40, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Hall of Shame

I have already contested its removal as it is a valid information page going back since 2004, and is of a informative nature. cathytreks (talk) 17:17, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

New German Critique

Reconsider please! --Ludvikus (talk) 19:18, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

It's important to have editors like you who police Wikipedia against junk. However, it seems to me that you did not use your discression in this instant regarding this scholarly item. You always can reconsider. So please don't waist my time in having to defend the stub. please consider a withdrawal of your Tag. Thanks. --Ludvikus (talk) 20:05, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Don't misunderstand me. Wikipedia needs you. What you do in general is very useful to WP. I just ask that you not be hasty. Furthermore, you can also always change your mind, and remove your Tag, no? --Ludvikus (talk) 16:35, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
I already appreciate your Good Faith. So you do not need to apologize to me so profusely. By the way, you remind me of my beloved mother (who, thank God is alive) who always nags me to through away my newspapers (which have articles I never yet had read, and wanted to, but will probably never have the time). What I wish - that you would respond to - is my friendly recommendation that you "look before you leap." Otherwise, I would like to call on you for you policing work. In fact, I have an Article in mind which would greatly benefit from your input. I'll be back momentarily . . . --Ludvikus (talk) 17:01, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Historical revisionism (negationism)

  • I think anything you do there would greatly benefit WP. I do not have the time now. --Ludvikus (talk) 17:06, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

speedies

Deletion as no claim to notability only applies to real people, not people in computer games. Web content can also be covered by this, but an XBox game is not web content.You need to use prod, or AfD. As the article on Kalm Argonar is contested, it would need to be Afd. Even to someone like me who is not familiar with the subject, the article is pretty obviously excessive--consider editing it instead, as deletion is the last resort. DGG (talk) 23:59, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Angelo Hastings

Ah yes - sorry about that. Was just on my way here to ask you about your use of the tag when MLT pointed it out to me. You can see why I was confused! Olaf Davis | Talk 00:01, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

No worries. When I first looked at that page I was a bit bewildered until I looked closer. Rob Banzai (talk) 00:02, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

I just wanted to say thank you for reverting vandalism on my talk page. -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:37, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

VoIP Dial Plan Page

Hi, I am still working on this page. I am always hitting save instead of preview and that is why it is currently short. I am in the process of making this bigger. Please hang on as I continue to create this further. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyberglobe (talk • contribs) 21:39, 30 April 2008 (UTC)