Talk:Radegund

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
More information about this article... This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality.

An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.

	Radegund is part of the WikiProject Saints, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christian liturgical calendars on Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to saints as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to saints. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.	Saints Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article may need an appropriate infobox template.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

• "needs photo" ?? are you joking? from the 6th century. yeah, sure. J. Van Meter 02:04, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Chaplain

There is no evidence that Venantius Fortunatus was Radegund's chaplain or held any official role in relation to Holy Cross. The use of this term here ought to be discussed.

[edit] Insufficient Context?

Contextualising Radegund might be tricky with out bloating the entry beyond usability. Perhaps a few links to other late c.6th entries would help - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merovingians - perhaps.

Also including Radegund in the category 'unknown importance saints articles' is frankly obscene. Radegund could well be considered the most important woman of the c.6th & is certainly important enough to be included in wikipedia. Rykalski 20:00, 28 August 2007 (UTC)