Talk:Radcliffe Borough F.C.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
The article on Radcliffe Borough F.C. is supported by the WikiProject on Football, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Association football related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ. |
|---|---|
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
This article is supported by the WikiProject on non-League football. |
 |
This article is supported by the England task force. |
[edit] Too personal?
The usage of words such as "we" are too personal for my liking and not encyclopedic in nature. This article should have a more impersonal feel to it. Any comments? --Siva1979Talk to me 09:48, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
-
- I'm pretty sure the body text is gleaned from the Boro website, or summat like that. I would rewrite, except I'm busy with exams and I don't know that much about the team -- Boothman 17:45, 9 May 2006 (UTC).
-
-
- Couldn't agree more, it looks more like a fanzine article than a encyclopedia article. I've made a lot of changes to alter the point of view from "we" to the third party, but there's an awful lot of stuff in there that just ought to be deleted. As the article stands it's almost impossible to see the wood for the trees. ---- Eric 22:20, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- As a member of the supporters club and the Match day tannoy announcer - i will look at this page and try and edit it as much as i can.The only problem is that i struggle using wikipedia tools and cannot really use it bar from editing,making basic tables and headers, so if someone could help me out i would be grateful. Heyesy 10:46, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
-
-
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:BoroBadge.jpg
Image:BoroBadge.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 18:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
