Talk:Quicksilver (software)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Software articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. | ||||||||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. | ||||||||
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
||||||||
|
|||||||||
Contents |
[edit] Long list of plugins
Is there any reason at all to have this hugs list of plugins taking up 3/4 of the article? It seems silly, and not particularly useful. Instead, the article should describe more of Quicksilver's function. --jacobolus (t) 22:22, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Agree--a shorter representative list should suffice. Maxiom 15:04, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Still seems too long. Perhaps the bullet lists should be removed entirely, in favor of just listing a few in the text? -- Steven Fisher 19:21, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] free software?
What's the license for this thing? Is it really free software or gratis proprietary software? a thing 05:30, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
- It is free gratis, but not free as in open source. --Steven Fisher 15:38, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
- - Should the status of the project be updated to reflect the new intentions of the developer (Alcor) and the fact it now seems open source Shedali (talk) 02:51, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] See also
I can't think of a single good reason for an extensive list of launcher programs to be attached to the See Also in this article. I think this should be changed to a category, of which this article is a member. -- Steven Fisher 20:30, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Quicksilverscreenshot.png
Image:Quicksilverscreenshot.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 14:19, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
