User talk:Queequeg731

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Hello Queequeg731! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Image:Wikisigbutton.png or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Patchouli 01:32, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

[edit] Albums

You have created a number of album pages of late, however, they have been rather poor. Check out Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums for some help on how to create a better album article. Also, make sure you provide a source for everything that you say. Rather than numbering your track listings, use this code-

# "Track one title"
# "Track two title"
so on...

One of the biggest problems with your articles is that there is no context. A track listing is not an article- inlude, as a minimum, a line about the artist, genre, record lable and release dates. An infobox would also be great, if you feel able to do one. I personally have written numerous articles on albums, perhaps you could check them to get a better idea? For example, Then & Again. That is a simple article, but it makes good use of everything I have mentioned. Oh, another note- split your articles into sections. I hope I have been helpful. If you want some help, or want to respond to what I have said, contact me at my talk page, I will see it there. J Milburn 01:49, 27 December 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Beyond Limits CDi

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Beyond Limits CDi, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Bubba hotep 20:05, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Little context in Megamix (Whigfield song)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Megamix (Whigfield song), by DearPrudence, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Megamix (Whigfield song) is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Megamix (Whigfield song), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Megamix (Whigfield song) itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 05:34, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Amazing and Beautiful / My My (Whigfield song)

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Amazing and Beautiful / My My (Whigfield song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. •97198 talk 07:46, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Think+Of+You+(Whigfield+song)

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Think+Of+You+(Whigfield+song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Rodhullandemu (talk - contribs) 01:48, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Last+Christmas+(Whigfield+song)

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Last+Christmas+(Whigfield+song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Rodhullandemu (talk - contribs) 01:49, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Amazing and Beautiful / My My (Whigfield song)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Amazing and Beautiful / My My (Whigfield song), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amazing and Beautiful / My My (Whigfield song). Thank you. •97198 talk 09:33, 27 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:CascadaPerfectDay.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:CascadaPerfectDay.jpeg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:56, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:CascadaPerfectDay.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:CascadaPerfectDay.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:39, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Aurora (Aurora (band) album)

A tag has been placed on Aurora (Aurora (band) album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Jobjörn (talk) 22:29, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Dusty Smiles and Heartbreak Cures

I have nominated Dusty Smiles and Heartbreak Cures, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dusty Smiles and Heartbreak Cures. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:57, 11 June 2008 (UTC)