User talk:Putmedown

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

Welcome!

Here are some cookies to welcome you! :D
Here are some cookies to welcome you! :D
Welcome to Wikipedia, Putmedown! I am GreaterWikiholic , and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! Hello, Welcome to the Hotel Wikipedia! I do hope you stay here permenantly and join us in making the Encyclopedia a better place. You shall write articles, revert vandalism, you will have fun here and you shall become a Wikiholic (like me). Please refrain from Vandalisim. Thank you, and welcome again. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! GreaterWikiholic 23:28, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

I accept the Nomination

I noticed that you nominated me for Administrator. I accept that nomination. Many thanks. I do enjoy cleaning up Wikipedia and helping new users. GreaterWikiholic 23:39, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

thanks

Thanks for the smile:)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/67.87.225.29

Anonymous users cannot serve as administrators. If you intent to contribute to the encyclopedia, please do. However, Wikipedia is not a playground, and I can't figure out why you have attempted to nominate a second user for adminship when you've done nothing else but play in the sandbox, with the exception of your nomination of GreaterWikiholic (talk · contribs) and sending a few smiles. - auburnpilot talk 16:20, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

unblock

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "i logged on for the first time today now and have not made any edits since May 31, 2007 probably a weak password (123)"


Decline reason: "We've heard it all before. — Sandstein 17:17, 18 July 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "i am serious i have not logged on since 31 May if you do not believe me try to log in to my account using the password 123 and also what do you mean by sock, i only have one account and i rarely may edit under my ip 67.87.225.29 and i did not log in since 31 May"


Decline reason: "As per Sandstein, above. Weak password is not an excuse. — ♠PMC♠ 02:16, 19 July 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "this is unreasonable, it was not me if you do not unblock me can you at least set the block to expire at some point in time, i promise i will change my password and make it stronger"


Decline reason: "Seems like you're either a sock or a sockpuppeteer, given another sock. — Kurykh 00:20, 20 July 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "i have one account and that is all i have please reduce my block so i can edit again and also can you show me evidence that i am a sock puppet because i do not like being called a liar or a sock puppet"


Decline reason: "You've had three unblock requests which is two more than you're entitled to. You're not getting any more.— Chaser - T 02:11, 20 July 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.