Talk:Powers of Ten

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Film Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
Additional Information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no

This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. A possibility for American films from before 1964 would be a screenshot from the trailer, as these are now in the public domain. Please make sure fair use is properly observed, or the image will be removed. See WP:Films MOS for image guidelines and assistance in uploading.

Contents 1 big = small 2 Other Versions or Similar Movies? 3 Images 4 Very Similar to Cosmic Zoom 5 Other Related works and references in pop culture 6 shown at NMPFT Bradforf, UK 7 Is it definitely 1977? 8 Men in Black reference 9 Removal of "needs infobox" tag 10 Zoom out but traveling in?

[edit] big = small

An interresting aspect mentioned by Robbert Dijkgraaf is that when one zooms out into the universe one goes back in time and thus the farthest image, of the whole universe, is really one of the universe at the 'time' of the Big Bang, when it was infinitely small. In this sense, the two extremes come together.

That's not interesting; it's contrived for the sake of parading the French proverb les extrêmes se touchent. The largest scale in Powers of 10 is 10²⁶ m, which is certainly not the 'whole universe'. In a square 10 billion light years on a side, the corners are just 7 billion light years from the center, where the Earth is located. That's just half the age of the universe. Most points in the square are considerably closer.
—Herbee 00:47, August 20, 2005 (UTC)

I wonder if the number 10²⁶ is really correct? The largest scale mentioned on the website is only 10²⁵ m. Pity I haven't seen the film.
—Herbee 01:03, August 20, 2005 (UTC)

I am not sure what you mean with that square and the points in it (how can a point be small? It has no dimensions). The comment was not on the the film specifically, but on the notion of zooming out (and thus going back in time - this might need some more explaining) until you reach the furthest point you can reach (whether the film does this or not is irrelevant - maybe that should be stated too), which corresponds with the Big Bang, just before which (there's a little flaw) the universe was immensely small ('infinitely small' is probably wrong). I don't claim to fully understand this (but then, who does?) but this is the best rendition I can give of what Dijkgraaf said. And I do find it an interresting obsevation, in the spirit of the film (mind-boggling aspects of the universe, or what should I call that). DirkvdM 07:12, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

No reaction to this yet, so I'll put it back and see what happens :) . DirkvdM 08:15, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Other Versions or Similar Movies?

I have seen this film (at School and in several museums) but I also recall once seeing a more recent movie that was very similar slightly more polished but in other ways not as good as the original. I think it may have been an IMAX (or another large format) movie. I also recall that instead of squares on the zoom out this other version had circles. Does anyone know about this or other remakes? -Waza 02:17, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

NASM IMAX Cosmic Voyage[1]. There have been several other movies and books too.[2] 66.30.119.55 14:35, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

When zooming out, the 10⁷ m rectangle fits snuggly around the Earth, when it should really be somewhat bigger

Did I miss something, or is the Earth's diameter no longer greater than 12,700,000m? Aragorn2 12:28, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

The Earth is slightly bigger. The article does seem a bit unclear. I tweaked it. 66.30.119.55 14:35, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

How Big Are Things? was an experiment in avoiding some of the pedagogical pitfalls of "Powers of Ten". 66.30.119.55 14:35, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

This may be relevant to the date discussion below also. There were at least two versions of the film. The first, which I saw (repeatedly) at the Air and Space Museum in DC maybe around 77/78 was in black and white, the picnicker was alone without the female companion, a few details like the dna were inferior, and the first narrator may indeed have been a female voice. I assume it was a prototype for the color version that followed, though the music was identical. Probably worth adding in, but wanted to check on discussion first. Chris Rodgers (talk) 06:54, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Images

This article would definitely benefit from images. I imagine the cover jacket of the book or video are considered fair use? 24.63.125.78 14:51, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Very Similar to Cosmic Zoom

This sounds almost identical to the 1968 Canadian short documentary Cosmic Zoom, which was based on the book Cosmic View. Pufnstuf 03:09, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Other Related works and references in pop culture

Contact and Men in Black had scenes that involved zooming out from earth to a scale much larger. Should they, too, be listed in this section of this article? --HantaVirus 19:12, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] shown at NMPFT Bradforf, UK

During the late 80's to mid 90's (AFAIK) this was shown continuously in a dedicated seating area in the bottom floor of bradford's national museum of photography film and television, saw it several times there when growing up and it totally blew my mind :-)

may be relevant to this page somehow, may not

[edit] Is it definitely 1977?

I could almost swear I saw this Powers of Ten (I'd forgotten the title, but I remember the man on the blanket) much earlier in the '70's, because it was in "Bull Moose Films" which were shown during lunch-ish time when I was at the University of Washington, and I wasn't there after about 1973. Can there have been an earlier version? 81.43.76.71 21:30, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Catanea

I'm very curious about this too, because in Schrader on Schrader (Faber, revised ed. 2004), there is an essay by Paul Schrader on Eames' work in film ("Poetry of Ideas: The Films of Charles Eames") which mentions Powers of Ten. The essay was originally published in Film Quarterly in Spring 1970 (seven years earlier than 1977, to emphasise the obvious), and the description it gives is that of a film the same as that on the Google website (currently linked to from the bottom of this article) in general terms, but not in specifics. It says that "the right central section of the screen pictures the actual zoom, at the left of the screen a dashboard with several clocks shows the total distance travelled, the power of ten achieved, the traveller's time, the earth time, and the percentage of the speed of light." This is all greatly simplified in the version linked to. Schrader also writes that "a dispassionate female voice ... describes every second of the journey in full" (in the linked version the voice is male). The score, however, seems to have been the same ("an eerie score supplied by Elmer Bernstein on a miniature Japanese organ").

So it seems there was indeed an version of the film earlier than 1977 (Schrader calls the film "recent", but I can't see a specific date). I'm reluctant to edit the article myself, since this is just something I've stumbled upon, and working it into what we've got already seems like a non-trivial task (especially given that I've never seen the original and know nothing about the circumstances under which it was apparently revised), but it's surely something that ought to be mentioned. --Camembert 17:27, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Without knowing its actual year, there was an earlier version; see discussion above under versions. Chris Rodgers (talk) 06:57, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Men in Black reference

I'm not sure that the feature film was referencing this short film specifically in that sequence. I've never seen this short film, nor can I recall having even heard of it until now, but I have seen a sequence before similar to the one in Men in Black, where zooming out ultimately showed something like what was portrayed in the feature film, with the entirety of the known universe as merely some trivial object in a fantastic setting, because I was reminded of it while I watched that part of Men in Black. Unfortunately right now I can't think of the source or even the details of this alternate reference. Of course, whatever it was I was reminded of could have been referencing Powers of Ten anyway. B7T 16:13, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Removal of "needs infobox" tag

This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB. Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 19:01, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Zoom out but traveling in?

One thing that has struck me as odd about Powers of Ten is whether we're really "zooming out" and "zooming in" as the article implies. When we travel into the blood vessel, we're not just magnifying / zooming in, but actually travelling INTO the body, no? Coop (talk) 15:34, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

The two are not mutually exclusive. The proton in the C nucleus is intended to be the center point; to look at it from far away, you must emerge from the atom, the human, the Earth's atmosphere, etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Glengarry (talk • contribs) 21:52, 8 April 2008 (UTC)