Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2008 March 9

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

< March 8 March 10 >

Contents

[edit] March 9

[edit] Image:RobinBachman.jpg

this image contains a false source/license and is non-free. 156.34.216.200 (talk) 20:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:FredTurnerbyBruceAndrewPeters.jpg

this image contains a false source/license and is non-free. 156.34.216.200 (talk) 19:58, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:RandyMurray2.jpg

this image contains a false source/license and is non-free. 156.34.216.200 (talk) 19:56, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:BlairThorntonbyBruceAndrewPeters.jpg

reason this image contains a false source/license and is non-free. 156.34.216.200 (talk) 19:37, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Wvine.jpg

Promotional photogragh for a TV show, not public domain. Polly (Parrot) 01:34, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Mowbray Park Lion.jpg

Not public domain but a copyrighted image from this website [1] Polly (Parrot) 01:42, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Map cranberry boundaries new.JPG

The copyright belongs to Mapquest, not the uploader, and copyrighted maps do not qualify as fair use. Mosmof (talk) 03:58, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Map cranberry boundaries.JPG

Same as above, copyright belongs to Mapquest. Mosmof (talk) 04:03, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Dokhtar_Tajiki.jpg

This image is "all rights reserved" on Flickr source Nv8200p talk 05:19, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Cubs-Fergie Jenkins1.jpg

Highly unlikely that the Flickr uploader owns the image copyright. Marked "All Rights Reserved" anyway, so the CC license is likely invalid. Mosmof (talk) 05:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Msryan.jpg

Highly dubious that the uploader owns this promotional shot — 218.186.8.11 (talk) 06:31, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:TEN1981.png

copyrighted logo Rettetast (talk) 10:46, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:TEN1975.png

As above Rettetast (talk) 10:47, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:ATV1969.png

as above Rettetast (talk) 10:48, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:ATVprelaunch.png

As above Rettetast (talk) 10:48, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:ATV1972.png

As above Rettetast (talk) 10:48, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:TVQ1974.png

As above Rettetast (talk) 10:48, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Brianphilipdavis.jpg

no evidence that photographer is chris barr Genisock2 (talk) 12:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Dorton_detail.jpg

No evidence that the source of the image gave permission to use the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 12:45, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Crispinfreeman in tokyo.jpg

no evidence that cousin agreed to image being released under a free license Genisock2 (talk) 12:57, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Edna Schmiidt .jpg

no evidence uploader is Jonh Burgos Genisock2 (talk) 13:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Eveandjack2.jpg

no evidence uploader holds the copyright Genisock2 (talk) 14:15, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Dots_SamanthaBrown.jpg

Image is "all rights reserved" on Flickr. Nv8200p talk 14:17, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

The OTRS ticket listed has an explicit grant of permission to place the image under the GFDL, which seems fairly conclusive. (Note that flickr doesn't give license tags other than CC ones, so...) Shimgray | talk | 19:07, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
I was the original uploader, I used the form letter Wikipedia:Boilerplate_request_for_permission example 2, and the copyright holder agreed to GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2, which I then forwarded to the OTRS people. I don't see the problem here. --Kolrobie (talk) 19:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
This listing is even irrelevant by the invented standards of the user who called for this. I asked the copyright holder to change the copyright on the image. It now is some rights reserved, but the most important part is http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/deed.en is that under this the new CC license I got from her is that "Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder," but this is still moot because I asked her and got the permission originally to use GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2--Kolrobie (talk) 18:35, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Googlesnarf.jpg

Orphaned picture of unknown animal, uploaded solely for use in speedily deleted hoax article Googlesnarf. Questionable license. Redfarmer (talk) 15:02, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Zhu-de.jpg

Claimed {{GFDL-with-disclaimers}}. Source is given as [2]. The source site's Permissions for Images page implies that many images on the site are in the public domain, though it seems that "sites on the internet" are assumed to constitute the "public domain". The source site freely acknowledges that "In no case does the Marxists Internet Archive own rights to images which we can give you licence to use." In any case there does not appear to be any mention of the GFDL on the source site, and we do not have an original source for this image, so the copyright status is impossible to verify. —Bkell (talk) 17:30, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:A Girl Like Me - Nikkole.jpg

This is an album cover, tagged with both {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} and {{Non-free album cover}}. The uploader, Seeinc, claims, "I am the author and owner of the image. www.nikkole.com". There is no evidence given that the uploader actually does hold the copyright to this album cover. —Bkell (talk) 18:05, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use in any event. FUR added. TJRC (talk) 01:50, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:11065662mecherylt1025200665526AM.jpg

Looks suspiciously like a promo photo, no information on the image other than the "self created" dual license tag. Sherool (talk) 18:21, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:AnnaLynne McCord.png

Promotional publicty shot, uploader is unlikely to hold the copyright as claimed. Polly (Parrot) 19:31, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Drake Bell 10.jpg

A CC license with a fair use rationale? No evidence that the CC license is correct, and without that the image fails wikipedia non-free image policy. Polly (Parrot) 19:41, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:JS 1.JPG

no evidence uploader is Mattheiu Young image appears to be a scan Genisock2 (talk) 20:01, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Andreas.png

Seems to be a classic "I make the screenshot so it's mine" case, but listing here just in case someone want to try making it policy compliant, although it's aparently only used to illustrate the actor's page so probably not. Sherool (talk) 20:51, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:BIC logo.svg

Everything looks all right, until one notices that the image is an SVG, which makes it ineligible for fair use under criterion 3b: Minimal extent of use. An entire work is not used if a portion will suffice. Low- rather than high-resolution/fidelity/sample length is used (especially where the original could be used for piracy). This rule also applies to the copy in the Image: namespace. Octane (talk) 20:52, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Two comments: First, this image is unquestionably unfree, and this is plainly stated on the image description page, so listing it at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images is not appropriate. Perhaps you wanted Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Second, there has already been quite a lot of discussion about whether logos in the SVG format are acceptable; see, for example, Wikipedia talk:Logos#SVG logos?. As far as I know, there hasn't ever been a clear decision in this matter—just lots of discussion. —Bkell (talk) 22:21, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
I did—apologies for the clutter. I was not, however, aware of the discussion about SVGs (as far as I knew, that had never been an issue). Octane [improve me?] 13.03.08 0057 (UTC)
This image is clearly fair use and a very good rationale has already been written for its use in the only article it is in. I have removed the claim from the image. JayKeaton (talk) 11:04, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Apollo_Perelini.JPG

Tagged as user created, but appears to actualy only be used by permission, there is a passing mention of fair use as wel but no attempt to actualy comply with WP:NFCC and it would likely not pass our non-free criteria for beeing replacable. Sherool (talk) 21:15, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Atlantissatellite.jpg

I find it highly unlikely the user created this image, I also don't see any ovious non-free use rationale for the image, but listing it here in case someone wants to take a crack at it. Sherool (talk) 21:33, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Drduomarco.jpg

It is doubtfult the government of Uruguay granted permission for this image to be used under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 22:29, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Samburns12.jpg

Image licensing doubtful, user uploaded image for use in vandal edits Roleplayer (talk) 23:03, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Demi Lovato.jpg

Looks like a publicity shot, no evidence that the GNU or CC licenses apply. Polly (Parrot) 23:51, 9 March 2008 (UTC)