User talk:JayKeaton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Note to posters - if I say summat to you, I will leave it on your talk page. Please be specific as I may not know what you are talking about. If you want to say summat to me I expect you to leave it on MY talk page, as I may not notice it on yours. And even if I do notice it, I may ignore it out of principle,

Archive no 1|Archive no 2|Archive no 3

Contents

[edit] 19

I liked your suggestion, thanks, it sounded more fair to me.  — Xiutwel ♫☺♥♪ (speech has the power to bind the absolute) 11:48, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits

Thank you. Your test was reverted. If you would like to test, please use the sandbox.


Just kidding. I didn't really appreciate the vandalism, but the sign did say vandalize, so I guess it's sort of okay. Next time, just update the counter. If you would like to really vandalize, let it all out at User:Basketball110/Vandal. Happy editing, Basketball110 what famous people say ♣ 21:42, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Well, I have to keep something true there. I already lied said so little on that page, so I could have what is left destroyed. Use the vandal page. I never remove things from there unless they are really bad. Basketball110 what famous people say ♣ 22:00, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
When I say really bad, I mean forging signatures of others. I've already had a problem with that. Basketball110 what famous people say ♣ 22:25, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
You can do that, but don't forge my signature. If you pretend it's me that's talking, I'll revert it. Also, don't do this. Basketball110 what famous people say ♣ 23:49, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
I encourage you to add something funny to the vandal page, but not with another person sig on it. Cheers, Basketball110 what famous people say ♣ 23:57, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Immortality, Baby

I thought you might want to know that I consider you friggin' hilarious, as per here. I've added it to here. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 21:12, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Weds is now on WP:RFD

I've added Weds to Redirects for deletion. Since you are one of two creators, I thought I'd add this here.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:32, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: WP:RFD

I really do not see how nominating those redirects is 'disruptive'. Overzealous, possibly [although I nominated them thinking that unlikely typo redirects that serve no real purpose should be deleted], but not disruptive. I will now most likely withdraw the nominations, as I now see that nominating them did more harm than good and the general consensus is that barely-plausible but still possible redirects should be kept [redirects are cheap after all]. However, I still do not agree with the behaviour being disruptive. What exactly have I disrupted? Thanks in advance. RichardΩ612 Ɣ |ɸ 15:06, May 13, 2008 (UTC)

[edit] DelRev: Corey_Worthington

Do you think this nomination for Deletion Review should be merged with the existing discussion about the article entitled Corey Delaney? 69.140.152.55 (talk) 07:20, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

I don't think you have a talk page yet so I will reply here. You are probably right, I was just following directions on the locked page. JayKeaton (talk) 08:05, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Or maybe you do have a talk page, who knew. JayKeaton (talk) 08:09, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
I have a talk page but no user page. If you want to create a user page for me, then be my guest. 69.140.152.55 (talk) 08:39, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Angela Beasley

See WP:BLP. Any sort of suspect info must be removed until proven reliable. There is no need for a specific consensus to remove in each case. There is a general consensus to remove in all cases. At this point there is no evidence that the info from NNDB is reliable. We don't know where they found it. We don't know who copiled the NNDB page. We don't know what sort of fact checking, if any, has been done by NNDB, or what their editorial policy is. Please address those points to help advance the discussion. Jehochman Talk 12:10, 17 May 2008 (UTC)