Talk:Planck energy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Physics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics.

Help with this template This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Physics because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{Physics}} template, removing {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

[edit] Weasel words, and meaningless factoid.

The Planck energy equals approximately the electricity consumed by an average person in a developed country in two weeks (2001 figures for US citizens).

When you say "electricity" what exactly are you referring to? It's generally understood to mean electric current. How do you convert energy (joules) into current (coulombs per second) to make this a meaningful comparison?

If you mean energy, then fucking say energy. "Electricity" is a meaningless word, and has no place in a science article.

Better yet, don't say it at all, because it's wrong and irrelevant. --75.58.54.17 06:53, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

I agree wholeheartedly, and would like to subscribe to your newsletter and/or mailing list. --76.217.94.0 (talk) 22:34, 11 February 2008 (UTC)