User talk:Pjoef/Archive
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Welcome!
Hello, Pjoef, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --John 18:13, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Category:The Clash singles
Hello, Pjoef. A while ago a decision was made to not categorize single releases separately from non-single songs. As such, I've suggested that the two The Clash categories be merged, here. That discussion has a link to one previous discussion, which in turn has links to a few others. If you have any comments about this move, or would like to discuss it, please do not hesitate to join the active conversation. Regards ×Meegs 01:42, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Socialismo e Barbarie
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Socialismo e Barbarie, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.yellowpecora.net/cccp/socialismo_barbarie.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 14:10, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Clash singles chronology
Hi Pjoef and welcome to Wikipedia. It's an official policy here on Wikipedia that all claims should be attributable to a reliable, published source. It is helpful to other editors if you cite sources for your claims so that we can verify them.
I notice that your edits to the Clash singles chronology in various articles appear to conflict with this source. Can you please let me know what source you're using so that we can verify your claims? Thanks, Sideshow Bob Roberts 16:03, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Hi, Sideshow Bob Roberts
- I'm working on The Clash discography and I'm editing songs and albums articles to fit the Wikipedia standards. About the Clash singles chronology the main source are labels, sleeves, booklets and covers of 7" and 12" singles, albums and CD. Today I found this source [1]. Now I'm comparing and working on that data.... (Pjoef 17:27, 5 September 2007 (UTC))
| connollyco | rateyourmusic | wikipedia |
|---|---|---|
| 1977 March White Riot | 1977 White Riot / 1977 CBS 5058 | White Riot |
| 1977 May Remote Control | 1977 Remote Control / London's Burning [live] S CBS 5293 | Remote Control |
| 1977 September Complete Control | 1977 Complete Control / City of the Dead S CBS 5664 | Complete Control |
| 1978 February Clash City Rockers | 1978 Clash City Rockers / Jail Guitar Doors CBS 5834 | Clash City Rockers |
| 1978 June White Man In Hammersmith Palais | 1978 (White Man) In Hammersmith Palais / The Prisoner | (White Man) In Hammersmith Palais |
| --- | 1978 I Fought the Law / (White Man) In Hammersmith Palais 50738 | --- |
| 1978 November Tommy Gun | 1978 Tommy Gun / 1-2 Crush On You S CBS 6788 | Tommy Gun |
| 1979 February English Civil War | 1979 English Civil War / Pressure Drop 7082 1 26 | English Civil War |
| 1979 July I Fought the Law | --- | I Fought the Law |
| --- | 1979 Groovy Times / Gates of the West (NOT FOR SALE Epic AE7 1178) | Groovy Times |
| 1979 December London Calling | 1979 London Calling / Armagideon Time 7 issues | London Calling |
| --- | 1980 Clampdown / The Guns of Brixton (Australia 7" Vinyl Epic ES 486) | Clampdown |
| --- | 1980 Hitsville UK (UK CBS 9480) | Hitsville UK |
| 1980 February Train In Vain (Stand By Me) | 1980 Train in Vain (Stand by Me) / London Calling | Train in Vain |
| 1980 August Bankrobber | 1980 Bankrobber / Rockers Galore 8323 | Bankrobber |
| 1980 November The Call-Up | 1980 The Call Up / Stop the World | The Call-Up |
| 1981 January Hitsville UK | Hitsville UK 7" Vinyl Epic 51013 (USA ed.) | --- |
| 1981 April The Magnificent Seven | 1981 The Magnificent Seven / The Magnificent Dance | The Magnificent Seven |
| 1981 November This Is Radio Clash | 1981 This Is Radio Clash / Radio Clash 1797 | This Is Radio Clash |
| 1982 April Know Your Rights | 1982 Know Your Rights / First Night Back in London A2309 | Know Your Rights |
| --- | 1982 Should I Stay or Should I Go? / Inoculated City (USA [45 rpm] 7" Vinyl Epic 14-03006) | Should I Stay or Should I Go? |
| 1982 Rock the Casbah / Mustapha Dance | 1982 June Rock The Casbah | Rock The Casbah |
| 1982 July Should I Stay Or Should I Go? | --- | --- |
| --- | 1982 Straight to Hell | Straight to Hell |
| 1985 September This Is England | 1985 This Is England | This Is England |
| --- | 1988 I Fought the Law / City of the Dead - 1977 651172-7 | I Fought the Law (1988 re-release) ??? |
| 1990 July Return To Brixton (Remix) | 1990 Return to Brixton / The Guns of Brixton 656072-2 | --- |
| --- | 1991 London Calling / Brand New Cadillac | --- |
| --- | 1991 Should I Stay Or Should I Go/Rush | --- |
| --- | 1999 Complete Control [live] | --- |
[edit] Redirect
Hi. I just want to tell you that you shouldn't create redirects of songs to the album page except for in rare instances. They give the misleading impression that the song has a page and it's even worse when they are linked from the album page (Thus, Garageland (song) redirects back to The Clash (album) when it's linked from that page. I will try to delete them when I have time. gren グレン 04:34, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- Hi Gren,
- I'm so sorry, but right now I have little time to work on WikipediA, but I hope to work on these pages more in the next months. The redirections were intended as a temporary solution. Otherwise:
-
“Linking to the specific album on which the song appears is preferable and linking to the artist should be done only when the album does not have a page on Wikipedia.
-
There is consensus that the majority of songs do not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Songs should only have an individual article if there is enough material to warrant a detailed article.
-
To add a redirect to this category, put {{R from song}} after the redirect but on the same line (The redirect works only if in the first line, and any lines following the redirect line are ignored).” — from Redirects from songs (that's the opposite of what you wrote!)
- I think that we must add the redirect but to the relative album and a redirect to the category {{R from song}} on every page without enough material to be a good article. Today, I worked on this, but the result is little good. Also, I made some changes in your Watchlist about The Clash (User:Grenavitar/Watchlist:The Clash). Songs, EPs, Compilations and Albums are retrivied, in alphabetical order, from their categories, Category:The Clash songs and Category:The Clash albums.
- Cheers, and have a nice weekend!
- (Pjoef 18:32, 21 September 2007 (UTC))
[edit] Too many line breaks
Hi there. I notice you keep inserting multiple line breaks when you edit articles, for example here. Note that inserting that many line breaks causes the articles themselves to get extra line breaks, which is inappropriate. I've reverted such changes of yours on multiple occasions, for example here. Please take care not to insert that many line breaks. Thanks in advance. --PEJL 12:23, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Hi PEJL,
- Thank you for the information. I retrivied more from Manual of Style:
-
“Spaces above and below headings are completely optional. Spaces between the == and the heading text are also optional (
==Heading==vs== Heading ==). With the current MediaWiki software, these extra spaces will not affect the appearance of the heading in any way; the rendered page is identical. Multiple blank lines will add white space, ...” — see more
- Inserting one or more line breaks after a heading doesn't causes the articles to get extra line breaks. It only facilitates the editing, and the source code becomes easier to read. Otherwise, a selective inserting of more than one line break before a Heading produces, in some cases, a more legible articles. — Thank you again, (Pjoef 14:28, 21 September 2007 (UTC))
-
- Inserting one or two line breaks in succession generally doesn't cause the article to get extra line breaks. Whether doing so makes the code easier to read is debatable, and not something I'd like to debate here. But inserting more than two line breaks in succession generally causes the article to get extra line breaks, which is what is inappropriate. If articles needed more line breaks to be legible, they would have that extra margin by default. Editors should not add additional margins into articles. I see on your user page that you consider yourself an HTML/CSS professional. As such, I'm sure you'll agree that
<p><br/></p>(which is what additional line breaks generate) is inappropriate HTML markup. --PEJL 14:54, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Inserting one or two line breaks in succession generally doesn't cause the article to get extra line breaks. Whether doing so makes the code easier to read is debatable, and not something I'd like to debate here. But inserting more than two line breaks in succession generally causes the article to get extra line breaks, which is what is inappropriate. If articles needed more line breaks to be legible, they would have that extra margin by default. Editors should not add additional margins into articles. I see on your user page that you consider yourself an HTML/CSS professional. As such, I'm sure you'll agree that
-
-
-
- No problem. --PEJL 15:28, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
-
-
[edit] WikiProject Alternative music September 2007 Newsletter
|
The Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter Issue 6 - September 2007 |
|
|
User:Dihydrogen Monoxide and User:Connorhalsell joined the alternative music fold during September.
|
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated Xihix 23:11, 6 October 2007 (UTC) .
[edit] Clash song articles
Hi, and thank you for your contributions. However Wikipedia:Notability (music) has "Most songs do not merit an article and should redirect to another relevant article, such as for a prominent album or for the artist who wrote or prominently performed the song. A separate article is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; permanent stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album. Wikipedia:Verifiability states: "If an article topic has no reputable, reliable, third-party sources, Wikipedia should not have an article on that topic.”" and I think these would be better as redirects to London Calling. --John 03:18, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- I've now done that, and I am truly sorry to have had to undo so much of your well-intentioned hard work. I think there may be other ways you can help improve our coverage of The Clash which will be more beneficial to our users than creating articles on every single song they released. --John 05:03, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- Hi, John
- I don't think so! I want to explain to you from my point of view:
- A song without its own article could be not categorized;
- if an user wants to know more about a song, find those informations on the relative album/artist article is not a good choice;
- if someone wants to add some information about a song, its own article is the right place to do that;
- the extra track listing template (you have deleted) is (IMO) the best way to navigate across the tracks of an album;
- there are a lot of stubs on Wikipedia and the majority of songs do not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines!
- In my opinion, an article for all of the songs recorded by The Clash is the best (and right) choice! — Cheers, (Pjoef 12:34, 12 October 2007 (UTC))
-
- I appreciate your opinion but I'm afraid the notability guidelines take higher priority as they constitute a consensus formed over a long period by many users. It may be true that many song articles do not meet our notability standards, but that is not a case for keeping poor articles but perhaps for changing the other unsatisfactory ones to redirects or deleting them. Let me know if there are specific ones you have in mind. --John 18:46, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The Clash
Hey, thanks for your message. I have removed the intro length template. It would have helped if I had left a message on the article talk page addressing my concerns, as was my intention, but I got distracted, and failed to do so. I appreciate your edits (all of them, as you have done great work recently on the article), and the fact that you discussed the matter with me rather than simply removing the template yourself. Cheers! ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 23:26, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The Working Man's Barnstar!
| The Working Man's Barnstar | ||
| Awarded to Pjoef for tireless effort sorting out the references in The Clash article |
Wwwhatsup 03:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] PopUps
BTW Pjoef, do you use Popups? I find it saves a lot of time. I love the ability to check links by highlighting them while editing. Wwwhatsup (talk) 09:06, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Any joy with that? Wwwhatsup (talk) 19:23, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Clash question
I was curious if you knew the origin of “THE ONLY BAND THAT MATTERS!” Was it the Clash, a record company, or someone in the press who created that phrase? Kingturtle (talk) 16:05, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- Please, see: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_The_Clash#The Only Band That Matters —PJoe F. (talk • contribs) 18:40, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Alternative music December 2007 Newsletter
|
The Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter Issue 9 - December 2007 |
|
|
Pjoef, WeBuriedOurSecretsInTheGarden, Argezas, Pbroks13 and Paper Back Writer 23 joined the alternative music fold during December.
|
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated xihix(talk) 05:00, 2 January 2008 (UTC) .
[edit] Re: French spacing
I have never set out to edit an article merely to remove the double spacing, but have only done so if I was in the midst of making other edits. I do not even really do it consciously, it has just always been a change I've made as a matter of course. I do not see the necessity for it, but if you would prefer, I'll not do so on The Clash article. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 15:48, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Clash
Hi. I noticed this. What do you suppose "yabbos" are? Would a third-party lyrics site qualify as a reliable source, do you think? --John (talk) 16:28, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Re: The Clash article
Thanks! Sorry for the cite error, I suppose I should have payed more attention. 75pickup (talk · contribs) 19:02, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Johnny Green
As a published author he should merit an article even if it's brief? Wwwhatsup (talk) 14:25, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Alternative music January 2008 Newsletter
|
The Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter Issue 10 - January 2008 |
|
|
Skeeker, Dethzone, Sceptre, IN THE EFFIGY, Crislee 88, Grrrlriot and Indopug joined the alternative music fold during January.
|
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated xihix(talk) 00:20, 2 February 2008 (UTC) .
[edit] WP:FILMS Welcome
Hey, welcome to WikiProject Films! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of films, awards, festivals, filmmaking, and film characters. If you haven't already, please add {{User WikiProject Films}} to your user page.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
- The project has a monthly newsletter. The newsletter for January has been published. February's issue is currently in production; it will be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.
There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:
- Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
- Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the Announcements template to see how you can help.
- Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of every film article in Wikipedia. Check it out!
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Nehrams2020 (talk) 21:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Hey
Do you like the Beatles? Tell me your opinion on my talk page. Thanks!It's the Kodster! (talk) 20:33, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Favorite Subjects
Hey, I checked out your Favorite Subjects. Pretty cool.
We don't have much in common really. 'Cept that I like Hendrix. Other than that, :|
Just wanted to tell you. I'm a real hardcore Beatlemaniac! Strawberry Fields 4RVR!
See ya. Being for the Benefit of Mr. Kodster! (talk) 01:35, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] London Calling 01
The main concern was that the books weren't cited in the article yet, hence the section retitling. I've noticed some editors like to list books even if they aren't used in the article, and it confuses things. As the article is up for a GA nomination, I thought it was best to make a distinction. By all means list the books if they are cited directly in the article, but it's best not to do it before, because they haven't been used yet. WesleyDodds (talk) 09:49, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

