Talk:Pilot (One Tree Hill)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pilot (One Tree Hill) article.
Article policies
Good article Pilot (One Tree Hill) was a nominee for good article, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
TV
Television Portal
This article is part of WikiProject Television, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to television programs and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Assessment comments

Contents

[edit] Notice of One Tree Hill episode article review

The individual episode articles for One Tree Hill (TV series) are now being reviewed according to episode notability guidelines. Please contribute to the discussion on Talk:List of One Tree Hill episodes#Episode article review. Thanks. -- Jack Merridew 10:18, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] One Tree Hill episode Infobox

I have created three new templates Template:One Tree Hill episode, Template:Infobox One Tree Hill season 1 episode list and Template:Infobox One Tree Hill season episode list. Please discuss below whether you believe the co-stars field should or should not be removed and why. I have created it and am using it in this article, though I am more than happy to remove the field if its entry is too large. Hpfan9374 08:26, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

  • I have decided to remove it, I took a look at many other television series episode infoboxes and none had the field. Hpfan9374 08:34, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Peer Review

I have recently submitted this article for Peer Review, to find ways to expand the article, and modify it so that it can reach a higher class. Hpfan9374 09:13, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

I have took note of the Peer review, and have made the appropriate changes. Hpfan9374 06:12, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Good article

I have recently submitted this article as a good article nominee, as I have made the appropriate changes from the peer review, there may be a few further edits that are required to pass this.. Hpfan9374 06:13, 15 October 2007 (UTC)


This article looks like it was written by a 12 year old girl! OMGZ THEY LIKE EACHOTHER LIKE SO MUCH LOLZE —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.224.252.62 (talk) 02:27, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Quick failed GA normination

Hi there! Thanks for submitting this nominating this article as a Good Article. Unfortunately, I'm quick-failing the article without a full review because it's pretty clearly not going to meet the GA criteria. For one thing, I've tagged it as being written in an "in universe" style, meaning that some sections of it are written as if the fictional events have really happened, rather than being an objective summary of the plot, the production, and the impact of the episode. For example, the entire Plot section is not written in the appropriate style. For examples of what's a better style for the article, check out some of the Good Articles under the television episodes subsubsubsubsection on the Good Articles page. If you have any questions, please send me a message on my talk page. Thanks for your work on the article to this point. Cheers! Esrever 03:37, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

  • That's okay. Atleast now I understand what needs to be done, in order for it to pass next time. Thanks. Hpfan9374 12:08, 22 October 2007 (UTC)