User talk:Picapole
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Picapole, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Katr67 22:35, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] July 2007
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Lars Larson, you will be blocked from editing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.20.184.141 (talk • contribs) 10:04, July 5, 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. It appears you have not followed this policy at Lars Larson. Please always observe our core policies. Thank you. Katr67 22:14, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Lars Larson, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Pablo Talk | Contributions 00:58, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Lars Larson
Continuing to revert edits to the version of the article you prefer is wasting your time and that of several other editors. Rather than reverting without explanation, could you please attempt to explain your reasoning on the article's talk page? Without any discussion, edit summaries, or citations of reliable sources, we really have no choice but to look at your edits as vandalism. Katr67 21:20, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
-
- Ditto. A "revert war" is just a waste of time if there's no discussion to accompany it. If you continue to edit in the same way, I'll be requesting that you be blocked. -Pete 00:46, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Lars Larson, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. —EncMstr 17:19, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Final warning on edit warring
You have been reported for engaging in edit warring. Since you did not perform any more reverts since the warning you were given, you will not be blocked at this time. However, please note that repeated reversions without discussion are considered disruptive behavior, if you continue to edit in this manner, you will be blocked from doing editing at all. If you disagree with other editors, please visit the article's talk page (the "discussion" tab at the top of the page) to discuss your concerns with them instead of performing repeated reverts. Also, please remember to fill out the edit summary field with a concise summary of what you're doing and why. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Seraphimblade Talk to me 23:34, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] August 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. It appears you have not followed this policy at Lars Larson. Please always observe our core policies. Thank you. Katr67 17:18, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
