Talk:Piazza Fontana bombing
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Name
I suppose the name should be in English. Maybe "Piazza Fontana bombing"? --Orzetto 08:14, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Links to "Gladio"
..can you say "conspiracy theory"? That the attacks were perpetrated by neofascists who tried to pin them to the communist party, does not make this a covert CIA operation. Until you present some proof to the opposite (not including the 30-year old Soviet forgery of the non-existant "supplement B" to the Field Manual 30-31), allegations about Gladio connections with Ordine Nuovo are just hot air. 193.92.81.11 00:37, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
- Please refer to Wikipedia:NPOV dispute: "Then, under this new section, clearly and exactly explain which part of the article does not seem to have a NPOV and why. Make some suggestions as to how one can improve the article. Be active and bold in improving the article." I advise you to read or find someone to translate you this Repubblica article which back-up claims in this article. It is a well known historical fact, proven by investigation by judge Felice Casson and others, that Gladio has engaged in false flag attacks in Italy. I don't know exactly what you mean by a "conspiracy theory", because I don't think that Italian victims of the Piazza Fontana bombing or the 1980 Bologna massacre think it's "just a theory". ps: the Repubblica link that is provided here and in the main-text of the article also give links to the Italian Commission on Terrorism report and the original juridical sentences. CQFD.The proofs may be found in the Italian Parliamentary Report on terrorism (La Commissione Stragi if you have some problems...), available at the source given in the article: [1] (La Repubblica article). Tazmaniacs 00:08, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
- Apparently these proofs were not enough for people to be convicted of this bombing, after judicial proceedings ended in 2005. I've added a POV tag, as the article is pretty one-sided. Intangible2.0 16:30, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Also remember that Wikipedia:Reliable sources says: "Exceptional claims require exceptional sources". Intangible2.0 16:31, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

