Talk:People's Political Power of Canada
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada and related WikiProjects, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canada-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project member page, to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Political parties, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of political parties-related topics. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to "featured" and "good article" standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details. [View this template] |
| Portal | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
Couldn't this party be considered Christian Democratic? Their social conservativism and their economic policies almost seem to me to be sort of a radical version of Christian democracy. 24.32.220.158 20:37, 11 November 2006 (UTC) James
- This statement is pretty POV but...they seem like a Christian version on the Natural Law Party (i.e. fluffy-bunny). They have some rather, ahem, unusual ideas: like enforcing a seventh-day holiday, and shutting down businesses who disobey. Or, like putting all convicted criminals in the Army (like we need Paul Bernardo running around with a C7 and combat training). I think they are definitely a fringe party. </POV> I don't know what the litmus test is for Christian Democrats on this side of the pond, but they don't appear (at my first perusal) to be related to what I've read about the European variety. --SigPig |SEND - OVER 04:44, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Though it has some similarities, they don't say they are Christian Democratic, or even that they are Christian. Thus, since they don't describe themselves as such, I don't know if we need mention it in the article. That said, I agree with the assessment of it as a (capital F) Fringe party --Quadraxis (talk) 04:13, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Peoplespoliticalpower.png
Image:Peoplespoliticalpower.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 00:56, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
