User talk:Penarc
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Sj0051.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:Sj0051.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Tellyaddict 11:56, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Baccharis linearis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ≈ The Haunted Angel 22:27, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image licensing issues
You uploaded Image:Galldet.JPG, the license of which states that it is usable for non-commercial and/or educational uses only. However, according to Wikipedia's image policy, it is not usable as there is no restriction that Wikipedia content cannot be used for any other uses than whats specified. As a result, such images are deleted.
However, judging from the metadata of the image showing that it was taken by a personal digital camera, I am inclined to think that you may be the original creator of the image. If you are indeed the original author of the image, you may release it under a free license so that it may become usable here. In that case, you may replace the license section of the image with a free license like {{GFDL-self}}).
If you are the creator of the image, please update the license soon, or else the image will be deleted. Thanks. --soum (0_o) 19:54, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Detail work
Thanks again for taking for taking the time to attend to picky details in articles (Hipólito Ruiz López). KP Botany 19:33, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
-
- Hi Penarc. I'm glad I could help out. Thanks for adding the information. I wrote a lot of the English article on Hipólito Ruiz López, or more correctly I loosely translated the Spanish Wikipedia article. I meant to write on on Pavón as well, but couldn't find much information on line. I am not a botanist, but rather a historian. However, User:KP Botany, who wrote the original stub, is a botanist. You might want to contact him. I applaud your writing in another language. I read Spanish pretty well, but I would never be able to write an article for the Spanish Wikipedia. --Rbraunwa 02:37, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Kork.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kork.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:55, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Cryptocarya_alba2.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Cryptocarya_alba2.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:07, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Tsvet.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Tsvet.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:11, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sophora
Hi Penarc - thanks for the note! If you have information on additional information with references on genus splits, please add it! - MPF 21:28, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Rhyniophyta
The image you added to this page was misidentified. It is an illustration of Aglaophyton major', which it not a vascular plant. older texts call this plant "Rhynia major", but more recent anatomical studies of material from the Rhynie chert have shown it contained no vascular tissue, so the plant was removed from both the genus Rhynia as well as from the Rhyniophyta. It is a polysporangiate bryophyte. --EncycloPetey (talk) 14:09, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Reiche
I looked at the article and added most of the information from the German and Spanish pages. Let me know if there was anything else you wanted to add. You can also check to make sure it is correct and the citations are correct (I assumed the ones from the Spanish page were correct). Rigadoun (talk) 05:13, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] No entendí
El mensaje anterior.--Domingo Portales (talk) 17:12, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- En mi página de inicio. Ya entendí, gracias--Domingo Portales (talk) 17:13, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Propolis references
Ola! :-) I have gone through the propolis article and done up the references. Cheers! Jon (talk) 08:41, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Morfoanatomia celula vegetal.png
Hi Penarc!
We thank you for uploading Image:Morfoanatomia celula vegetal.png, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 20:44, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

