Talk:Panasonic Q

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

↓    Skip to table of contents    ↓

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Panasonic Q article.
Article policies
Famicom style controller This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article is on a subject of low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0.
A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)
A request for box art or an application icon has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)
VG To-do:
Wikitendo logo This article is part of WikiProject Nintendo, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Nintendo related merchandise and video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid This article is on a subject of mid priority within Nintendo for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0.


[edit] Verify?

The line "Q's DVD quality is greater than the other consoles." Where is the proof for this claim? Why is the quality better. This needs to be expounded on to avoid being POV. K1Bond007 00:33, May 18, 2005 (UTC)

it's true, i also need a proof it is better than other consoles

i heard ps2 dvd was just plain, wasn't allthat, so xbox must be better

>x<ino 15:24, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] GameCub?

I seem to remember hearing about this several years ago being refered to as the GameCub (I think that's how it's spelled) pronounced as -coob and not -cyoob (kub not kjub in IPA). Can anyone confirm this? ~ Oni Lukos c 17:21, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

nope, sorry, searched nothing like that >x<ino 15:24, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Merge


Looking at this article, it doens't pack with a lot of information. I know someone like me or someone, if they actually do have that console, they might give in some information. With els information, I suggest this article should be merged with the Nintendo Gamecube article! It will have a minature section, under all the information about the Gamecube. What do you think? -->x<ino 03:17, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

No. There's information out there on the Q; it's just that as of yet, no one's put it in there. You wouldn't have merged the Nintendo GameCube article in 2001 with the video game console article just because there wasn't yet enough information in it, would you?—thegreentrilby 03:42, 19 March 2006 (UTC)


I say YES >:)

>x<ino 03:49, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
I say No. 04:07, 19 March 2006 (UTC)—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Eruption1978VHt2 (talk • contribs) .
It's a distinct entity. I say No. AKismet 18:25, 31 October 2006 (UTC)