Talk:Oxalis corniculata

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Oxalis corniculata is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to plants and botany. For more information, visit the project page.
???	This article has not yet received a quality rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale.

	Oceania Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polynesia, which collaborates on articles related to Polynesia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Assessment comments This article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

Portal	Oxalis corniculata is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Assessment comments This article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

16:32, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Osborne (talk)== Corniculata vs. Stricta ==

Hi, I'm seeing on Google when searching for Yellow Wood Sorrel that the top links say this is Oxalis Stricta not Oxalis Corniculata. Please see:

http://www.cloudnet.com/~djeans/FlwPlant/yellowWoodSorrel.htm

Since I'm not an expert on plants, I don't feel qualified to make the change myself, but I thought I'd add this piece of knowledge for whomever wants to take it up.

Thanks!

lunaverse 23:51, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] General Layout

Thinking: Should the general lay-out not be as in the algae. That is with sections:"Description"; "Distribution"; "Habitat" and the like? There not many species of algae written up, there are probably many more flowering plants written up!Osborne (talk) 16:33, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes it should; but no-one has gotten around to it yet on this article. Feel free to sectionise it if you wish. Hesperian 23:47, 20 May 2008 (UTC)