From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects.
Click [show] for further details |
|
This article is part of WikiProject Crime, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide on true crime and criminology-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| B |
This article has been rated as B-class on the assessment scale. |
| Low |
This article is on a subject of Low-importance for crime-related articles. |
Here are some tasks you can do to help with WikiProject Criminal Biography:
- Requests: Magdalena Solis, Justina Morley, Impersonating an officer, List of major crimes in the United States, Shanghai Kelly, Tucker Prison Farm, Kendall Francois, Purgatory Correctional Facility
- Expand: Credit card fraud, Theresa Knorr, Marybeth Tinning, Brenda Ann Spencer, Lords of Chaos (self-styled teen militia),
- Stubs: Calling card (crime), Federal crime, Leslie Irvin (serial killer), Violent crime, Crime Classification Manual, Anthony Sawoniuk Perfect crime
- Images: Charles Ray Hatcher, Thor Nis Christiansen, Richard Cottingham, Caleb Fairley
|
|
[edit] Sentencing Memoranda
There are two memorandums that are key for Operation Freakout. Kember and Budlong, and Mary Sue et al. The second has a PDF scan and a converted text (possibly with deadly misplaced commas). AndroidCat 02:07, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- I've added an HTML version of the Kember memorandum to Wikisource - I corrected it from an existing HTML version, which had some serious formatting errors and quite a few typos in it. We really ought to try to get the Hubbard memorandum on Wikisource as well. -- ChrisO 02:12, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
This article needs verifiability, these sources do not cover it. Mr mellowguy (talk) 01:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
- The memoranda are extremely verifiable. What exactly do those and the other refs not cover? AndroidCat (talk) 02:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
-
- Scientologists like to leave verifiability comments on articles critical of Scientology. If you look in the archives, this matter has already been addressed. Idag (talk) 22:17, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Archiving such a short talk page?
Looks like Scientology attacked by archiving 4 items on the talk page. Looks like the disgusting truth just hurt too much. --Chinese3126 (talk) 17:49, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- I set that stuff to archive, for discussions older than one month with zero new posts or discussion in that time. Will get to working on this article and upgrading its quality status at some point soon. Cirt (talk) 20:41, 21 March 2008 (UTC)