User talk:Olacsian

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Education Act 1944, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Education Act 1944 was changed by Olacsian (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-01-14T09:37:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 09:37, 14 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Little context in Elpido quirino

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Elpido quirino, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Elpido quirino is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Elpido quirino, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 11:30, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Golden rule of god

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Golden rule of god, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 13:42, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Golden rule of god, you will be blocked from editing. ukexpat (talk) 13:43, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Lava mountain

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Lava mountain, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.eandsweb.com/trails/trails/idaho/southwest_id/boise_national_forest/lava_mtn.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:03, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Golden rule of god

A tag has been placed on Golden rule of god, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redfarmer (talk) 14:08, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

If you want to recreate the page, which you should, you should name it The Golden Rule (Christianity) and provide references for it. Let me know if you recreate it so I can help. Saksjn (talk) 14:20, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems

Hello, Olacsian. Concerning your contribution, Lava pillars, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/vents/nemo/explorer/concepts/pillars.html. As a copyright violation, Lava pillars appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Lava pillars has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Lava pillars and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Lava pillars with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Lava pillars.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. JohnCD (talk) 14:27, 6 February 2008 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Lava pillars, you will be blocked from editing. JohnCD (talk) 14:28, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Your edit to Smokey Mountain has been reverted because it introduced copyright material. If you continue to introduce copyright material into Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further warning. JohnCD (talk) 14:34, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi. I take back the copyright warning above about Lava pillars - it seems the website you copied it from is a US Government one so its contents are in the public domain. But you do need to be careful about copyright if you copy things into Wikipedia: what you put into Smokey Mountain actually contained the words "COPYRIGHT 1995 Economist Newspaper Ltd." - there is no way Wikipedia could accept that. Look at the Introduction, the Tutorial, and the Guide to creating your first article for advice about contributing. JohnCD (talk) 17:47, 6 February 2008 (UTC)