User talk:No1lakersfan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you wish to leave a message for me, I have a few guidelines to help me read and reply to your message easier. First, to add a new message, click the + sign at the top of the page. Then, type a subject in the title box so that I will know what you are writing about, and I will be able to identify your message easily in the Table of Contents at the top of this page. Finally, before you send the message, please make sure that you sign it, using four tildes (~~~~), or by pressing the "Your signature with timestamp" button on the toolbar above the talk box. It is the third button from the right, beside the box with the red X. It is more difficult for me to reply if you do not sign the message, or just type your name.

Thank you, and I look forward to helping you here in Wikiland!

Please click here to leave me a new message.


Archive
Archives


Contents

[edit] would love to

thanks for the offer. What type of Virginia articles did you have in mind? I have already been working a little on Arlington, Virginia, but mainly I have been focused on NFL pages. Let me know your thoughts. Jwalte04 (talk) 17:08, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks and Happy New Year

Firstly, let me wish you a very happy New Year and thank you for all your help in the Milhist Tag & Assess 2007 drive.


Military history service award
For tagging and assessing 250 articles in Tag & Assess 2007, by order of the coordinators I hereby present you with this Military history WikiProject Service Award. --ROGER DAVIES talk 10:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)



Military history service award
For tagging and assessing 500 articles in Tag & Assess 2007, by order of the coordinators I hereby present you with this Military history WikiProject Service Award. --ROGER DAVIES talk 10:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)



Military history service award
For tagging and assessing 1000 articles in Tag & Assess 2007, by order of the coordinators I hereby present you with this Military history WikiProject Service Award. --ROGER DAVIES talk 10:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)



Secondly, although the Tag & Assess 2007 drive is now officially closed, you are very welcome to continue tagging and assessing until 31 January 2008. Any articles you tag and assess during this time will be credited fully to your tagging tally for further award purposes.

Thirdly, if you can find the time, it would be good to have your feedback/comments on the drive at the Tag & Assess workshop

Thanks again for your help, --ROGER DAVIES talk 10:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] My edit

hi, I am not a very experienced Wikipedian. I just removed a subsection entitled "Intelligent Design" that was poorly constructed, POV, and non-encyclopaedic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.89.218.49 (talk) 02:57, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Did you mean me?

Thanks for your answer. Wishing you a good new year and successful vandal hunting! 83.254.213.190 (talk) 17:43, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Game logs

Please get consensus at WT:MLB before continuing to change these game logs to templates. There is already a thread going, actually.   jj137 ♠ 21:23, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Two other people commenting isn't a consensus.   jj137 ♠ 21:29, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Admin coaching

Sure, I guess so. We could create a page where we keep all of our discussions and such.   jj137 ♠ 00:48, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

No problem. I updated the page, by the way.   jj137 ♠ 01:47, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
I've taken the liberty of modifying your answer: not because I want to change your own work, but because you accidentally listed your page on Category:Candidates for speedy deletion. Nyttend (talk) 04:29, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Your answers are very good. When you open your RfA (BTW, I can nominate you when the time comes if you want) you can probably just copy and paste your answers to the RfA page. Sometimes people like to see more areas of activity, but don't make it a priority to list more, as I think it is fine as is. That can just mess things up (I sort of learned that in my own RfA).   jj137 ♠ 01:47, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
I just need to archive my talk page, which I can do right after this. If you frequently use your watchlist (I do), we can both watchlist User:No1lakersfan/Admin Coaching and know when one person updates it. Or, we could just communicate via talk page, as we are now.   jj137 ♠ 02:14, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
I check my watchlist every few minutes, or sooner. It would probably be easier to keep discussion on the page so it stays organized. Actually, I don't mind either way.   jj137 ♠ 02:23, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Whatever you want. It can stay on the page, but it doesn't matter if we leave comments on our talk pages (if you see what I mean; just my opinion).   jj137 ♠ 02:30, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
That's a very good compromise.   jj137 ♠ 02:39, 11 January 2008

[edit] U.S. Roads Newsletter, Issue 1

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 2, Issue 1 • January 19, 2007 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Want to change your method of delivery? – It's all here. —Mitch32contribs 20:18, 19 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wowi.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wowi.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 10:46, 21 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wghfm.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wghfm.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 11:19, 21 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wpte.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wpte.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 11:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wroxfm.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wroxfm.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:16, 21 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wxmm.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wxmm.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wafxlogo.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Wafxlogo.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wvbw.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wvbw.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:14, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wvkl.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wvkl.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wkus.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wkus.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:16, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wnvz.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wnvz.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:16, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wohslogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wohslogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wwdefm.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wwdefm.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wcdg.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wcdg.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wwhv.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wwhv.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Little context in Category:Wikify from July 2006

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Wikify from July 2006, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Wikify from July 2006 is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Wikify from July 2006, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:00, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] USRD Newsletter - Issue 2

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 2, Issue 2 • 17 February 2008 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Want to change your method of delivery? – It's all here. —O bot (t • c) 03:30, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For your fine work on 2000 articles in Tag & Assess 2007, by order of the coordinators I hereby present you with this Tireless Contributor's barnstar. --ROGER DAVIES talk 03:17, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Admin coaching/Nomination

Sure, I'd still like to nominate you if you want. Would you like to go ahead and give that a try?   jj137 (talk) 21:25, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm in the process of writing your nomination. Do you have any FAs, GAs, etc.?   jj137 (talk) 00:34, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
OK, I've written your nomination. Tell me if I should change anything, and when you're ready, just accept it and transclude it on WP:RFA.   jj137 (talk) 01:07, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
It looks like you have a few questions to answer there.   jj137 (talk) 16:37, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Don't worry, I understand completely. It seems a lot of people are "per WODUP".   jj137 (talk) 20:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] DC Meetup on May 17th

Your help is needed in planning Wikipedia:Meetup/DC 4! Any comments or suggestions you have are greatly appreciated. The Placebo Effect (talk) 20:29, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your RfA

Sorry to oppose your nomination. Please bear in mind the well-intentioned advice I've left there. --Dweller (talk) 10:38, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Would you prefer this be closed early, or that it run its full, 1-week course? AGK (contact) 21:41, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/No1lakersfan 3

No1lakersfan, I am sorry to inform you that I have closed your RfA as unlikely to reach consensus: there was an 10:23 ratio against the request at the time of processing. However, don't be downhearted by this: I can assure you that your contributions are both highly welcome and valued—many editors have failed their first request for adminship, only to sail through later and become well-respected administrators.

You may wish to review the Guide to RfA before submitting future nominations, as well as well as here and here, both of which list the more highly-supported RfAs. Additionally, admin coaching is a useful aid for editors interested in becoming an administrator. If I can assist you at all, please do not hesitate to contact me. Kindest regards, AGK § 07:50, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] USRD Newsletter - Issue 3

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 2, Issue 3 • 22 March 2008 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Want to change your method of delivery? – It's all here. —О бот (т • ц) 21:35, 22 March 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wwhv.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Wwhv.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:20, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Deleted your comments left in a article talk page

Hey, I deleted a comment you left on the article auburn_senior_high school in June of 2006. I felt the issue was fixed that you mentioned and it had been awhile so if you have a problem with this either let me know and I'll revert the change or you can change it back yourself. bgrddg253 (talk) 20:44, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] News! Tag & Assess 2008 is coming ...

Milhist's new drive – Tag & Assess 2008 – goes live on April 25 and you are cordially invited to participate. This time, the task is housekeeping. As ever, there are awards galore, plus there's a bit of friendly competition built-in, with a race for bronze, silver and gold wikis! You can sign up, in advance, here. I look forward to seeing you on the drive page! All the best, --ROGER DAVIES talk 13:03, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

One Stripe (200 articles)
Two Stripes (400 articles)
Three Stripes (600 articles)
Tireless Contributor Barnstar (1000 articles)
Chevrons (2000 articles)
Working Man's Barnstar (3000 articles)
Barnstar of Diligence (4000 articles)
Third place overall
Second place overall
First place overall

[edit] USRD Newsletter, Issue 4

Apologies for the late delivery; my internet connection went down halfway through the delivery process.

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 2, Issue 4 • 30 April 2008 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Want to change your method of delivery? – It's all here. —Rschen7754bot (talk) 22:47, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Baseball Game Logs

I think that it would be fine to move them all back to the regular season pages. I think the user who moved all of the misunderstood the page about game logs, which probably needs updated anyway. I moved the Pittsburgh Pirates one, which I try to update everyday, back to the main article and nobody has complained. If you have anymore questions you know where to find me! Thanks! Blackngold29 17:31, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for moving the Phillies game log back. I didn't want to do it myself and take the chance of royally screwing it up, especially considering the fact that I'm the one who updates in all the time. I appreciate it! KV5 (talk) 22:13, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

I would try to find out who it was that reverted your edits and contact them directly. Cite the conversation on WP:BASEBALL's talk page where they were discussed. See if you can get them to discuss it at least. If you have any trouble with that let me know and I'll try to help you get them moved back. Blackngold29 00:42, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Caroline Seal.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Caroline Seal.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --05:50, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Baseball Game Log

OK, didn't realize there was a huge discussion about this. Still doesn't make sense. scrolling down through text is a real pain. It would be simple to have a template and a v.d.e link on the actual game log. Probably make everyone happy, but whatever. People who yell louder will always win in these situations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sloclops (talk • contribs) 16:21, 19 May 2008 (UTC)