User talk:Nicholas2020
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] WMA/WMV articles
- - Hello. Your contributions to the WMA/WMV articles do not seem to fully accurate and without citations. For instance, there seems to be no mention of a "Windows Media Video Professional" codec on Microsoft's website or anywhere else on the web. Also, note that WMV HD is a branding, not a codec in itself. Can you verify all your contributions with references?
[edit] re:WMA
- - I am sorry I misunderstood your intention, but the act of *singling out a service* which is identified by an external link sounds advertising-oriented act to me. Anyways, I have now realized what you are trying to show. But the wording is what bothers me. I am not particularly fond of "as of..." (articles are kept current, arent they?) and "only a few stores ..." is we (editors) making the conclusion, which, I am afraid, we are not allowed to do. To claim that only a few sources distribute, it needs to be attributed to a reliable source. That said, I too am having trouble formulating a sentence that I like. :D --soum talk 18:26, 26 July 2007 (UTC) -
- Thanks for paying attention to my suggestions. :) Anyways, hope you are having a nice time here. Feel free to contact me for any assistance. --soum talk 18:26, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Feedback for WMA
- It could become a good article, but not a featured article yet. It will need more pictures though, for eg: you could get a picture of a media player playing the file. If you are aiming for FA, you will need to have a history of the development of the file, which team was behind it. You need to get some citations for the intro as well. The article looks pretty good now. Not that many technical words are used for such an article. Hope this helps--Agεθ020 (ΔT • ФC) 20:21, 8 August 2007 (UTC) -
-
[edit] Peer review
- - I added a few suggestions for what you could do to improve the article, on the peer review you requested for the article, here. –sebi 07:46, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
