Talk:Never Better
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] GA on Hold
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:

- B. MoS compliance:

- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:

- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

- C. No original research:

- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- Is it neutral?
- Is it stable?
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
Overall, it's an okay article. But, it really needs more references, and it DEFINITELY needs more images, with captions for each. (The one that's here dosen't even have a caption). Leave a message on my talk page when you've fixed these problems.Limetolime (talk) 20:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Well, it's been a week, and the changes that were necessary to pass the article were not made, so I am afraid I'm going have to fail the article.Limetolime talk to me • look what I did! 01:03, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Categories: Former good article nominees | WikiProject BBC Sitcoms task force articles | Unknown-importance BBC articles | WikiProject BBC articles | B-Class BBC articles | WikiProject British TV shows articles | B-Class Comedy articles | Mid-importance Comedy articles | Wikipedia Did you know articles

