Talk:Naval operations in the Dardanelles Campaign

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces (general topics): Maritime warfare task force Associated task forces (nations and regions): Australian military history task force Balkan military history task force (c. 500–present) British military history task force French military history task force Ottoman military history task force Associated task forces (periods and conflicts): World War I task force

	Turkey Portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Turkey, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Turkey-related topics. Please visit the the participants page if you would like to get involved. Happy editing!
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	edit · history · watch · refresh To-do list for Naval operations in the Dardanelles Campaign:
No to-do list assigned; you can help us in improving the articles in the same category

[edit] About Turkish generals

Mustafa Kemal was low ranking officer back then. He had many superiors, like Von Sanders..

[edit] Sources?

From what I see, there are none listed, and the links below do not provide all of the information given in the article. Should this article be marked as not citing sources? Akallabet 06:13, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes. I've also re-assessed it as start class as it fails the referencing requirements for B-class. This is a pity because it is otherwise a very good article. --ROGER DAVIES ^TALK 11:00, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Rather silly that, really, categorising a lengthy and informtive article simply as 'start' just because no one inserted refs? Sandpiper (talk) 08:27, 3 June 2008 (UTC)