User talk:Mrfebruary

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Mrfebruary, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! 

Contents

[edit] AfD nomination of Canterbury Regional Council (Environment Canterbury)

Canterbury Regional Council (Environment Canterbury), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Canterbury Regional Council (Environment Canterbury) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canterbury Regional Council (Environment Canterbury) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Canterbury Regional Council (Environment Canterbury) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.-gadfium 00:47, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Central Plains Water Enhancement Scheme Timeline

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Central Plains Water Enhancement Scheme Timeline, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Central Plains Water Enhancement Scheme Timeline. Captain panda 23:34, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Central Plains Water Enhancement Scheme Timeline

An editor has nominated Central Plains Water Enhancement Scheme Timeline, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Central Plains Water Enhancement Scheme Timeline and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:59, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Ecan-backlog-11-02-08.jpeg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ecan-backlog-11-02-08.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 11:59, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Good work

Keep up the good work on Canterbury and on environmental issues. I like the new graph that you made for the resource consent article. Cheers. -- Alan Liefting- (talk) - 20:36, 22 March 2008 (UTC) Thank you.Mrfebruary (talk) 00:53, 23 March 2008 (UTC)