Talk:Mr. Do!
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Low | This article is on a subject of Low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. | |
|
VG To-do:
|
||
[edit] Archives
An archive of this talk page exists at Talk:Mr. Do!/Archive . — KieferSkunk (talk) — 21:37, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Cleanup
I cut back the gameplay section, trying to keep some of the relevant points. A lookover by someone familiar with the game would be good. --Lendorien 20:30, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'm posting this back on cleanup. Someone reverted my edits after I fixed it and removed it from cleanup in Oct, claiming they were unfair based on the fact that Pac-man has a long description. This is little justification to keep it the way it was. I hate to say it, but what it was reverted to is a lengthly unpargraphed mess of poorly worded descriptions of the game that make little sense, are hardly readable and are not needed for an article about a game that is as non-notable as this one. I personally think that what I edited to it would have been fine and more concise, but I don't want to create a revert war here by going back to it myself. Maybe someone else can find a happy medium. See my original edit here. If you make changes, post on the Talk page to prevent a revert war with the original author. --Lendorien 16:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- This is a reply to an old comment (and I archived a more recent and very massive entry further down on the page). I rewrote the page just a bit ago to conform with project guidelines and WP:TRIVIA. The current version should be a good point from which we can expand into areas such as cultural impact and reception. Hope it helps. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 21:40, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Protection
Please do not add the {{sprotect}} template, since this page is not and has never been protected [1]. I do not see much vandalism here, and actually the last instance of it I could find is from September 2006. I have added this page to my watchlist, anyway, so that I could protect it if I see an unusual amount of vandalism here. Tizio 13:56, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
To elaborate a little more on this: a page is not protected by simply adding templates such as {{sprotect}} to it. It is protected via the form [2], which only works for administrators. Tizio 14:01, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
