Talk:Mount Seymour
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information) | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale for WikiProject Mountains. | |
| If you have rated this article please consider adding assessment comments. | ||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada and related WikiProjects, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canada-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project member page, to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
|
 |
 |
It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in British Columbia may be able to help! |
| The Free Image Search Tool (FIST) may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 |
It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in British Columbia may be able to help! |
See talk at Category_talk:Canadian_ski_resorts regarding Seymour's categorization as a "ski resort". Thanks! --Ds13 15:10, 2005 May 27 (UTC)
[edit] Is This Appropriate?
Hey wait a minute here.
This article is almost entirely about the Mount Seymour *Ski Resort*. It isn't really about the *real* Mount Seymour (as a geographical feature) at all, other than the incidental references.
I'm thinking that this article should be renamed to "Mount Seymour Ski Resort". Then I could put in a new "Mount Seymour" article which would describe the mountain itself.
Any objections?
Psi4ce 04:12, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
no objections here.
Nope
ThePopester87 15:45, 10 April 2006 (PST)
Is there enough material for two articles? If not, see what you think of my rewrite of the first two paragraphs. I tried to put a focus on the mountain first, and then continue with the ski area. (If this works for you, we could then add in sections about hiking, back-country, etc. to keep it from being a shill for the company.) --Ckatz 07:14, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Seymour Mountain
I'm thinking with should make a redirect page for seymouyr mountain to redirect here...whatta y'all think? TotallyTempo 19:12, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
