Talk:Mohawk Airlines Flight 411

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Mohawk Airlines Flight 411 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
Article milestones Date Process Result September 16, 2006 Articles for deletion Kept October 7, 2006 Good article nominee Listed Current Status: Good article

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated projects or task forces: This article is not currently associated with a task force. To tag it for one or more task forces, please add the task force codes from the template instructions to the template call.

[edit] GA failed

1. Well written? Fail

2. Factually accurate? Fail

3. Broad in coverage? Fail

4. Neutral point of view? Pass

5. Article stability? Pass

6. Images? Pass

Additional comments :

• The lead section doesn't summarize the article it brings more information.
• No inline citations and poorly referenced.
• Not broad enough.

  Nothing about the flight (depature, when was the landing scheduled, length of the trip)

Lincher 01:14, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GA re-review / promoted

1. Well written? Pass

2. Factually accurate? Pass

3. Broad in coverage? Pass

4. Neutral point of view? Pass

5. Article stability? Pass

6. Images? Pass

Great work on re-ordering the stuff, adding material and cutting the extra from the lead section. The only thing that could be added would be to expand the lead section to talk about the investigation just in 1 line or 2. Nice work. Lincher 01:42, 8 October 2006 (UTC)